TaiLexi AI U.S. Case Law

Perez v. Hurstell

Omer PEREZ Et Al. v. Lawrence HURSTELL

Perez v. Hurstell, 200 So. 305 (La. 1941)
Download
Format
Include

Star paging (*137) is kept for pin cites.

Court
Supreme Court of Louisiana · State Highest Courts
Decided
January 6, 1941
Docket
No. 35922.
Judges
Ponder
Citations
200 So. 305196 La. 9361941 La. LEXIS 994

Opinion of the Court — Ponder

*937 PONDER, Justice.

• This is an appeal from a judgment in favor of the plaintiff in a general election contest.

This case and the cases of Andrew Nunez et al. v. A. J. Plaisance, La.Sup., 200 So. 302 , 1

and Frank J. Campo v. Ben Acosta, La.Sup., 200 So. 305 , 2

were consolidated for the hearing of the appeals because identical issues were presented. The cases differ only in that different offices are involved. In each of them the defendant received more votes at the general election, by the voters writing in his name, than the plaintiff, whose name was printed on the ballot.

We have recited and discussed the issues presented in all of these cases in Pur opinion handed down this day in the case of Andrew Nunez et al. v. A. J. Plaisance, La.Sup., 200 So. 302 , 1

and for the reasons stated therein the judgment in this case is reversed and set aside; accordingly, the suit is dismissed at appellees’ cost.

1

196 La. 926 .

2

196 La. 936 .

How later courts describe this case

No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.

1941: 41990: 119412026peak 1941 · 4

Relies on it most ⓘ

  1. Serpas v. Trebucq1 So. 2d 346 (La. Ct. App. 1941)
  2. Campo v. Acosta200 So. 305 (La. 1941)
  3. Williams v. Ragland567 So. 2d 63 (La. 1990)
  4. Nunez v. Plaisance200 So. 302 (La. 1941)
  5. Serpas v. Trebucq1 So. 2d 705 (La. Ct. App. 1941)

Most recent

  1. Williams v. Ragland567 So. 2d 63 (La. 1990)
  2. Serpas v. Trebucq1 So. 2d 705 (La. Ct. App. 1941)
  3. Serpas v. Trebucq1 So. 2d 346 (La. Ct. App. 1941)
  4. Campo v. Acosta200 So. 305 (La. 1941)
  5. Nunez v. Plaisance200 So. 302 (La. 1941)

Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.

Authorities cited 2

DepthCaseCited by
Nunez v. Plaisance, 200 So. 302 (La. 1941) 5
Campo v. Acosta, 200 So. 305 (La. 1941) 4

Keyboard shortcuts

/Focus the search box
j kNext / previous result
EnterOpen the selected result
xAdd / remove the selected result from the download list
n pNext / previous search term in a case
cCopy the citation of the current case
+ −Larger / smaller reading text
?Show this list