Louis Vernell, Jr. v. United States
Louis VERNELL, Jr., Petitioner-Appellant, v. UNITED STATES of America, Respondent-Appellee
Opinion
*964 PER CURIAM:
Louis Vernell appeals from the denial on September 7, 1976, of his Motion for Rehearing and Vacation of an Order dismissing his § 2255 petition. The Motion for Rehearing and Vacation of an Order requests reconsideration of issues which have been raised and reviewed in earlier motions and appeals. Vernell still asks that his conviction be overturned because of the same “newly discovered evidence” which was before this court at the time of his first direct appeal and because of the same perjured testimony and alleged wiretap which was before this court on the appeal from the denial of the motion for a new trial. The grounds raised in the instant § 2255 petition have been previously decided by both the district court and this court in petition for rehearing, motion for new trial, and the direct appeal therefrom. Accordingly, we AFFIRM.
See, e.g., Blackwell v. United States, 429 F.2d 514 (5 Cir. 1970);
Del Genio v. United States, 352 F.2d 304 (5 Cir. 1965).
How later courts describe this case
No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.
Cited by 11 cases
View all citing references →Relies on it most ⓘ
- Raymond L. Buckelew and James Laney Jenkins v. United States of America, Judson Lee Drane v. United States
- Bobby Lee Moore v. United States
- David Isaiah Garris v. Charles S. Lindsay, Administrator, Maximum Security Facility
- United States v. Billy G. Byers
- United States v. Nicholas Palumbo
- United States v. Willard R. Sanders
Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.