Earl B. Collins, and v. Donald H. Rumsfeld, and and Other Consolidated Cases
Opinion
559 F.2d 1178
Earl B. COLLINS et al., Plaintiffs-Appellees and Cross-Appellants, v. Donald H. RUMSFELD et al., Defendants-Appellants and Cross-Appellees, and other consolidated cases.
Nos. 75-2935, 75-2967, 75-3238, 75-3348, 75-3432 and 75-3559.
United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
Aug. 25, 1977.
Eric A. Seitz, Honolulu, Hawaii, argued for appellees in 75-2935 and for appellants in 75-2967.
Scott J. Tepper, Los Angeles, Cal., argued for appellees in 75-2935, 75-3238, 75-3432 & 75-3559, and for appellants in 75-2967 & 75-3348.
Neil H. Koslowe, Atty., U.S. Dept. of Justice, Washington, D.C., argued for appellees in 75-2967 & 75-3348, and for appellants in 75-2935, 75-3238, 75-3432 & 75-3559.
Before CHAMBERS and SNEED, Circuit Judges, and SWEIGERT * , District Judge.
PER CURIAM:
1
Our previous decision in this consolidated appeal, Collins v. Rumsfeld, 542 F.2d 1109 (9th Cir. 1976), was vacated and remanded to us by the Supreme Court "for further consideration in light of United States v. Larionoff, 431 U.S. ----, 97 S.Ct. 2150 , 53 L.Ed.2d 48 (1977)." Saylors v. United States, --- U.S. ----, 97 S.Ct. 2945 , 53 L.Ed.2d ---- (1977), vacating Collins v. Rumsfeld, 542 F.2d 1109 (9th Cir. 1976). The Court's decision in Larionoff controls the case before us. The judgments of the district courts are AFFIRMED.
* Honorable William T. Sweigert, Senior United States District Judge, Northern District of California, sitting by designation
How later courts describe this case
No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.
Cited by 1 case
View all citing references →Relies on it most ⓘ
Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.