TaiLexi AI U.S. Case Law

Poehlman v. Poehlman

Ella L. Poehlman v. . John N. Poehlman.

Poehlman v. Poehlman, 102 A. 1052 (Md. 1917)
Download
Format
Include

Star paging (*137) is kept for pin cites.

Court
Court of Appeals of Maryland · State Highest Courts
Decided
January 31, 1917
Judges
Boyd, Briscoe, Burke, Thomas, Pattison, Urner, Stockbridge, Constable
Citations
102 A. 1052130 Md. 695
Syllabus
Divorce: adultery; acts after bill filed; custody of children pending bill; costs and counsel fees. Costs and counsel fees may bo allowed a wife, even after her appeal from a decree of divorce against her; and a final decree may be modified in that respect, even after a divorce a, vinculo. While a ease is pending for the divorce of a wife on the ground of adultery, the Court may retain jurisdiction over the children, and direct that they remain in the custody of their father. A decree of divorce can not be founded on acts of adultery committed subsequent to the filing of the bill.
Summary
Appeal from the Circuit Court for Baltimore County. (Duncan, J.)

Syllabus and headnotes are prepared by the reporter or publisher, not the court, and are not part of the opinion.

Opinion of the Court — Boyd

Boyd, C. J., delivered the opinion of the Court, affirming the decree, each side to pay their own costs (exclusive of costs already paid by the appellee under order of Court).

How later courts describe this case

No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.

1919: 11929: 11934: 11958: 219192026peak 1958 · 2

Relies on it most ⓘ

  1. Oliver v. Oliver140 A.2d 908 (Md. 1958)
  2. McCabe v. McCabe146 A.2d 768 (Md. 1958)
  3. Kirkwood v. Kirkwood170 A. 180 (Md. 1934)
  4. Carter v. Carter144 A. 490 (Md. 1929)
  5. Pangle v. Pangle106 A. 337 (Md. 1919)

Most recent

  1. McCabe v. McCabe146 A.2d 768 (Md. 1958)
  2. Oliver v. Oliver140 A.2d 908 (Md. 1958)
  3. Kirkwood v. Kirkwood170 A. 180 (Md. 1934)
  4. Carter v. Carter144 A. 490 (Md. 1929)
  5. Pangle v. Pangle106 A. 337 (Md. 1919)

Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.

Authorities cited 0

No citations to other opinions in this database were found.

Keyboard shortcuts

/Focus the search box
j kNext / previous result
EnterOpen the selected result
xAdd / remove the selected result from the download list
n pNext / previous search term in a case
cCopy the citation of the current case
+ −Larger / smaller reading text
?Show this list