Bobby Hardwick v. Ollie Doolittle, Jailer, and William Anderson, Sheriff
Bobby HARDWICK, Petitioner-Appellant, v. Ollie DOOLITTLE, Jailer, and William Anderson, Sheriff, Respondents-Appellees
Opinion
PER CURIAM:
Appellant points out that our prior opinion did not expressly deal with his contentions of systematic exclusion of blacks, women, and citizens 18 through 24 years of age from jury service; the right to a hearing on his second special plea of insanity; the delay in bringing a second indictment which violated his rights to a speedy trial; the delay of his retrial past the time set in a prior federal habeas order; and denial of counsel. Each of these matters was thoroughly considered by the panel and found to be lacking in merit.
The petition for rehearing filed by appellant is DENIED, and no member of this panel nor judge in regular active service on the court having requested that the court be polled en banc, (Rule 35, Federal Rules of Appellate Procedure; Local Fifth Circuit Rule 12) the Petition for Rehearing En Banc is DENIED.
How later courts describe this case
No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.
Cited by 10 cases
View all citing references →Relies on it most ⓘ
Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.