TaiLexi AI U.S. Case Law

Northern Central Railway Co. v. State

The Northern Central Railway Company v. . the State of Maryland.

Northern Cent. Ry. Co. v. State, 51 A. 1108 (Md. 1901)
Download
Format
Include

Star paging (*137) is kept for pin cites.

Court
Court of Appeals of Maryland · State Highest Courts
Decided
July 5, 1901
Citations
51 A. 110893 Md. 737
Disposition
Affirmed.
Syllabus
Taxation of the Northern Central Ry. Co.
Summary
Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court of Baltimore City (Stockbridge, J.)

Syllabus and headnotes are prepared by the reporter or publisher, not the court, and are not part of the opinion.

Opinion of the Court — Per Curiam

The Court in a per curiam opinion filed on December 7th, 1900, said : The questions involved on this appeal are the same that were decided- by this Court in the case of The State of Maryland v. The Northern Central Railway Company, reported in 90 Md. 447 . At that time we were called upon, at the instance of the State, to review the rulings of the Court below,, which had granted the first prayer offered by the defendant (the Railway Company), and rejected the second. We reversed the lower Court and awarded a new trial. At the retrial of the case, the first and second prayers offered by the. defendant (being the same offered at the first trial) were rejected and judgment was entered for the plaintiff. The defendant excepted to the action of the Court in refusing to grant its-two prayers and prosecuted this appeal. Without repeating-them, for the reasons given in the opinion reported as above-stated, we think there was no error in rejecting both prayers offered by the defendant (now appellant), and will affirm the-judgment.

How later courts describe this case

No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.

1910: 11928: 119102026peak 1910 · 1

Relies on it most ⓘ

  1. Diggs v. Fidelity & Deposit Co.75 A. 517 (Md. 1910)
  2. Western Md. Ry. Co. v. Commissioner12 B.T.A. 889 (B.T.A. 1928)

Most recent

  1. Western Md. Ry. Co. v. Commissioner12 B.T.A. 889 (B.T.A. 1928)
  2. Diggs v. Fidelity & Deposit Co.75 A. 517 (Md. 1910)

Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.

Authorities cited 1

DepthCaseCited by
State v. Northern Cent. Ry. Co., 45 A. 465 (Md. 1900) 15

Keyboard shortcuts

/Focus the search box
j kNext / previous result
EnterOpen the selected result
xAdd / remove the selected result from the download list
n pNext / previous search term in a case
cCopy the citation of the current case
+ −Larger / smaller reading text
?Show this list