TaiLexi AI U.S. Case Law

Hospelhorn v. Blankman

John D. Hospelhorn, Receiver v. . Meyer Blankman

Hospelhorn v. Blankman, 198 A. 598 (Md. 1938)
Download
Format
Include

Star paging (*137) is kept for pin cites.

Court
Court of Appeals of Maryland · State Highest Courts
Decided
April 21, 1938
Docket
Nos. [No. 43, January Term, 1938.]
Judges
Bond, Offutt, Parke, Sloan, Mitchell, Shehan, Johnson
Citations
198 A. 598174 Md. 2771938 Md. LEXIS 269

Opinion of the Court — Parke

PARKE, J., delivered the opinion of the Court.

The appeal in this case of John D. Hospelhorn, receiver of the Baltimore Trust Company, plaintiff, against Meyer Blankman and Wilmer P. Smith is the third one of four appeals on the docket of the January term, 1938. The questions raised on these appeals have been stated and the views of the court set forth in the opinion filed in the appeal of John D. Hospelhorn, receiver of the Baltimore Trust Company, against Philip L. Poe, trading as Philip L. Poe & Co., which is No. 21 on the appeal docket of this court for the January term, 1938. 198 A. 582 .

On September 11th, 1931, certain shares of stock of the Maryland Trust Company were purchased by brokers for the account of Meyer Blankman, a. defendant, and the shares of stock were issued to one Wilmer P. Smith, a defendant, and an ■ employee of the brokers, and the stock registered in his name on the books of the company, but the certificates of stock were delivered by the broker to Meyer Blankman as his property and he has retained possession of the certificate, but the stock remained registered in the name of Smith. For the reasons assigned in the opinion in No. 21, Wilmer P. Smith, the registered owner of the stock, is liable for the payment of the assessment. The allegations of the declaration do not show any ground upon which there can be a joinder of Blankman, and, for this misjoinder, the court sustained the demurrer of Blankman. The ruling is sound, and the judgment in favor of Blankman will be affirmed.

Judgment affirmed, with costs to the appellee.

How later courts describe this case

No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.

1938: 21939: 119382026peak 1938 · 2

Relies on it most ⓘ

  1. Blankman v. Hospelhorn9 A.2d 831 (Md. 1939)
  2. Hospelhorn v. Poe198 A. 582 (Md. 1938)
  3. Hospelhorn v. Emerson200 A. 378 (Md. 1938)

Most recent

  1. Blankman v. Hospelhorn9 A.2d 831 (Md. 1939)
  2. Hospelhorn v. Emerson200 A. 378 (Md. 1938)
  3. Hospelhorn v. Poe198 A. 582 (Md. 1938)

Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.

Authorities cited 1

DepthCaseCited by
Hospelhorn v. Poe, 198 A. 582 (Md. 1938) 22

Keyboard shortcuts

/Focus the search box
j kNext / previous result
EnterOpen the selected result
xAdd / remove the selected result from the download list
n pNext / previous search term in a case
cCopy the citation of the current case
+ −Larger / smaller reading text
?Show this list