United States v. Sherryl Lynn Grimsbo Henricksen
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Sherryl Lynn Grimsbo HENRICKSEN, Defendant-Appellant
Opinion
PER CURIAM:
Defendant Sherryl Lynn Grimsbo Henricksen was convicted of conspiracy to possess with intent to distribute, and possession with intent to distribute cocaine, in violation of 21 U.S.C.A. §§ 846 , 841(a)(1). Prior to trial, a codefendant, whose testimony would have tended to exonerate Henricksen, plea bargained with the Government. As part of his plea, he had to agree not to testify in any manner regarding Henricksen. If he did testify, the Government stated the agreement would be void, and he would be tried on all counts of the indictment. The codefendant refused to testify.
The Government, with the concurrence of the Justice Department and the trial judge, has now confessed error on this point and has requested that we reverse the conviction and remand for a new trial. Based upon an independent examination of the record, we conclude that the Government’s confession of error is in order. Substantial Government interference with a defense witness’ free and unhampered choice to testify violates due process.
United States v. Morrison, 535 F.2d 223 (3d Cir. 1976);
United States v. Thomas, 488 F.2d 334 (6th Cir. 1973).
See United States v. Valdes, 545 F.2d 957, 959-961 (5th Cir. 1977).
The judgment of conviction is reversed and the case is remanded for a new trial.
REVERSED AND REMANDED.
How later courts describe this case
Explanatory parentheticals written by citing courts — 10 in all; the most informative distinct ones are shown.
-
(holding government violated due process when it told the co-defendant that his plea agreement would be void if he testified for a co-defendant)
-
(agreement not to testify in any manner regarding codefendant constituted substantial interference with witness’s choice to testify and violated due process)
-
(defense witness intimidated by terms of plea bargain)
-
(invalidating a no-testify plea agreement)
Cited by 48 cases
View all citing references →- U.S. Courts of Appeals21
- Federal District Courts7
- Military Courts1
- State Highest Courts8
- State Appellate Courts11
Relies on it most ⓘ
Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.