TaiLexi AI U.S. Case Law

United States v. Sherryl Lynn Grimsbo Henricksen

UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Sherryl Lynn Grimsbo HENRICKSEN, Defendant-Appellant

United States v. Sherryl Lynn Grimsbo Henricksen, 564 F.2d 197 (5th Cir. 1977)
Download
Format
Include

Star paging (*137) is kept for pin cites.

Court
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · U.S. Courts of Appeals
Decided
December 8, 1977
Docket
No. 77-5159
Judges
Thornberry, Roney, Hill
Citations
564 F.2d 1971977 U.S. App. LEXIS 5709

Opinion — Per Curiam

PER CURIAM:

Defendant Sherryl Lynn Grimsbo Henricksen was convicted of conspiracy to possess with intent to distribute, and possession with intent to distribute cocaine, in violation of 21 U.S.C.A. §§ 846 , 841(a)(1). Prior to trial, a codefendant, whose testimony would have tended to exonerate Henricksen, plea bargained with the Government. As part of his plea, he had to agree not to testify in any manner regarding Henricksen. If he did testify, the Government stated the agreement would be void, and he would be tried on all counts of the indictment. The codefendant refused to testify.

The Government, with the concurrence of the Justice Department and the trial judge, has now confessed error on this point and has requested that we reverse the conviction and remand for a new trial. Based upon an independent examination of the record, we conclude that the Government’s confession of error is in order. Substantial Government interference with a defense witness’ free and unhampered choice to testify violates due process.

United States v. Morrison, 535 F.2d 223 (3d Cir. 1976);

United States v. Thomas, 488 F.2d 334 (6th Cir. 1973).

See United States v. Valdes, 545 F.2d 957, 959-961 (5th Cir. 1977).

The judgment of conviction is reversed and the case is remanded for a new trial.

REVERSED AND REMANDED.

How later courts describe this case

Explanatory parentheticals written by citing courts — 10 in all; the most informative distinct ones are shown.

Cited by 48 cases

View all citing references →
1979: 11980: 21982: 21983: 11984: 51985: 31986: 21987: 11988: 11990: 21991: 11992: 11993: 21994: 21995: 31997: 21998: 12000: 22005: 12006: 12009: 22013: 12014: 12015: 32016: 12018: 32025: 119792026peak 1984 · 5

Relies on it most ⓘ

  1. United States v. Schlei122 F.3d 944 (11th Cir. 1997)
  2. United States v. Roberto Hernandez-Escobar911 F.3d 952 (9th Cir. 2018)
  3. United States v. George Terzado-Madruga897 F.2d 1099 (11th Cir. 1990)
  4. United States v. Larry Hammond598 F.2d 1008 (5th Cir. 1979)
  5. State v. Fox491 N.W.2d 527 (Iowa 1992)
  6. McMillian v. Johnson878 F. Supp. 1473 (M.D. Ala. 1995)

Most recent

  1. Anthony Abbatiello v. Brian Emig, Warden, and Attorney General of the State of DelawareNo. 1:21-cv-00272 (D. Del. Oct. 30, 2025)
  2. United States v. Roberto Hernandez-Escobar911 F.3d 952 (9th Cir. 2018)
  3. United States v. Vasquez-Hernandez314 F. Supp. 3d 744 (W.D. Tex. 2018)
  4. State v. Jackson2018 Ohio 1633
  5. United States v. Sean Gerald Penoncello671 F. App'x 399 (8th Cir. 2016)
  6. Darryl Colbert v. State of Minnesota870 N.W.2d 616 (Minn. 2015)

Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.

Authorities cited 3

DepthCaseCited by
United States v. Morrison, 535 F.2d 223 (3d Cir. 1976) 212
United States v. Thomas, 488 F.2d 334 (6th Cir. 1973) 69
United States v. Valdes, 545 F.2d 957 (5th Cir. 1977) 16

Keyboard shortcuts

/Focus the search box
j kNext / previous result
EnterOpen the selected result
xAdd / remove the selected result from the download list
n pNext / previous search term in a case
cCopy the citation of the current case
+ −Larger / smaller reading text
?Show this list