United States v. William W. Holland

UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. William W. HOLLAND, Defendant-Appellant

United States v. Holland, 565 F.2d 383 (5th Cir. 1978)

Court: Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · U.S. Courts of Appeals
Decided: January 4, 1978
Docket: No. 76-3763
Judges: , Ains, Brown, Clark, Coleman, Godbold, Goldberg, Morgan, Roney, Thorn-Berry, Worth
Citations: 565 F.2d 3831978 U.S. App. LEXIS 13201

Opinion

BY THE COURT:

The mandate of the court having prematurely issued incident to the panel opinion and having properly been complied with by the district court, and the cause having thereafter been voted en banc by the court, IT IS ORDERED that the mandate herein remain undisturbed, that the opinion of the panel, reported at 552 F.2d 667 , be withdrawn, and that the en banc court be dissolved.

How later courts describe this case

No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.

Cited by 8 cases

View all citing references →

Relies on it most ⓘ

Marshall v. Gibson's Products, Inc. of Plano584 F.2d 668 (5th Cir. 1978)
United States v. Anita Lynne Erwin625 F.2d 838 (9th Cir. 1980)
6 O.S.H. Cas.(bna) 2092, 1978 O.S.H.D. (Cch) P 23,148 F. Ray Marshall, Secretary of Labor, United States Department of Labor v. Gibson's Products, Inc. Of Plano, a Corporation584 F.2d 668 (5th Cir. 1979)
Sanchez v. Attorney General598 P.2d 1170 (N.M. Ct. App. 1979)
Marshall v. Shellcast Corp.592 F.2d 1369 (5th Cir. 1979)
In re Handwriting Exemplar of Casale487 A.2d 877 (Pa. 1985)

Most recent

In re Handwriting Exemplar of Casale487 A.2d 877 (Pa. 1985)
United States v. Anita Lynne Erwin625 F.2d 838 (9th Cir. 1980)
State v. Mitchell602 P.2d 1383 (Kan. 1979)
Sanchez v. Attorney General598 P.2d 1170 (N.M. Ct. App. 1979)
7 O.S.H. Cas.(bna) 1239, 1979 O.S.H.D. (Cch) P 23,458 F. Ray Marshall, Secretary of Labor, United States Department of Labor v. Shellcast Corporation, a Corporation592 F.2d 1369 (5th Cir. 1979)
Marshall v. Shellcast Corp.592 F.2d 1369 (5th Cir. 1979)

Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.

Authorities cited 1

Depth	Case	Cited by
	United States v. Holland, 552 F.2d 667 (5th Cir. 1977)	12

`/`	Focus the search box
`j` `k`	Next / previous result
`Enter`	Open the selected result
`x`	Add / remove the selected result from the download list
`n` `p`	Next / previous search term in a case
`c`	Copy the citation of the current case
`+` `−`	Larger / smaller reading text
`?`	Show this list