People v. Di Laura
People v. Di Laura.
Opinion of the Court
Wiest, J.
The information charged defendants with conspiring to obtain money by false pretenses, subtle means and devices, from five named persons. Defendants were convicted and prosecute review.
Defendants operated a private bank and received money to be forwarded to Italy, and, it was claimed, converted the same to their own use. There was also a count in the information for larceny by conversion, but this was waived by the prosecution at the close of all proofs.
The court was requested to instruct the jury as to what would constitute subtle means, devices, and false pretenses, but failed to do so.
The information charged a conspiracy to defraud. This necessarily involved a combination to accom *262 plish a fraud. We find no evidence justifying the finding of a conspiracy. It appears that persons, without solicitation other than the existence of a bank, deposited money to be forwarded to Italy, and such money was not forwarded by defendants. Whether this constituted the crime of larceny by' conversion we need not determine, for such charge was withdrawn.
To constitute a conspiracy, there must exist a combination to accomplish an unlawful end, or a.lawful end by unlawful means.
The verdict was not supported by the proofs, and the convictions are reversed and new trials granted.
Clark, C. J., and McDonald, Potter, Sharpe, North, Fead, and Butzel, JJ., concurred.
How later courts describe this case
No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.
Cited by 8 cases
View all citing references →Relies on it most ⓘ
Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.