TaiLexi AI U.S. Case Law

In re Times Publishing Co.

In re Times Publ'g Co., 267 N.W. 858 (Mich. 1936)
Download
Format
Include

Star paging (*137) is kept for pin cites.

Court
Michigan Supreme Court · State Highest Courts
Decided
June 16, 1936
Docket
Nos. 32, Calendar No. 37,420.
Judges
Wiest, North, Fead, Bushnell, Sharpe, Toy, Butzel, Potter
Citations
267 N.W. 858276 Mich. 3491936 Mich. LEXIS 968

Opinion of the Court — Wiest

Wiest, J.

A bill of complaint was filed in the circuit court for the county of Genesee, in chancery; a *350 temporary injunction issued and the papers suppressed by order of the circuit judge and, to that end, sealed in an envelope with public access thereto prevented. In some manner, not disclosed, reporters of defendant Times Publishing Company obtained full information relative to the allegations in the bill and published the same. Upon citation and hearing defendants were adjudged guilty of contempt of court in so publishing the suppressed matter and, by appeal, prosecute review.

The silence imposed did not and could not extend beyond the secrecy ordered. That secrecy remained unbroken by defendants. No silence upon the right of free speech or freedom of the press was or could be imposed if the subject-matter was obtained from any source outside of the court records. To hold otherwise would violate rights guaranteed to a free people.

It may be held that the court had control over its records and the publicity thereof until service of process or judicial action, although this should be sparingly exercised and only to ends commensurate with justifiable needs, but this power cannot be extended to curtailment of free speech or of the press upon information aliunde the records suppressed.

The case does not call for a dissertation upon the freedom of the press, and we decline to “carry coals to Newcastle.”

Upon the record before us defendants were not guilty of contempt of court, and the adjudication is reversed and they are freed therefrom.

North, C. J., and Fead, Bushnell, Edward M. Sharpe, and Toy, JJ., concurred. Butzel and Potter, JJ., did not sit.

How later courts describe this case

No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.

1985: 119852026peak 1985 · 1

Relies on it most ⓘ

  1. In re Midland Publishing Co.362 N.W.2d 580 (Mich. 1985)

Most recent

  1. In re Midland Publishing Co.362 N.W.2d 580 (Mich. 1985)

Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.

Authorities cited 0

No citations to other opinions in this database were found.

Keyboard shortcuts

/Focus the search box
j kNext / previous result
EnterOpen the selected result
xAdd / remove the selected result from the download list
n pNext / previous search term in a case
cCopy the citation of the current case
+ −Larger / smaller reading text
?Show this list