TaiLexi AI U.S. Case Law

Cox v. Bell

Cox v. Bell.

Cox v. Bell, 244 N.W. 161 (Mich. 1932)
Download
Format
Include

Star paging (*137) is kept for pin cites.

Court
Michigan Supreme Court · State Highest Courts
Decided
September 16, 1932
Docket
Nos. 44, Calendar No. 36,349.
Judges
Potter, Clark, McDonald, Sharpe, North, Fead, Wiest, Butzel
Citations
244 N.W. 161259 Mich. 5551932 Mich. LEXIS 1019

Opinion of the Court — Potter

Potter, J.

Plaintiff, as administrator of the estate of George E. Mead, deceased, brought suit against defendants to recover damages caused by the negligent killing of plaintiff’s intestate. There was judgment for defendants and plaintiff appeals. At the time of the accident, plaintiff’s decedent was driving westerly on Sixth street in the city of Monroe at a point where it intersects the Dixie highway, *556 a stop street. Defendant Fisk was driving south on Monroe avenue, which is the Dixie highway. Besides the driver in defendant’s automobile there was but one eyewitness. The undisputed testimony shows plaintiff’s decedent was driving westerly at approximately 35 miles an hour with his automobile, he did not stop at the stop street at its intersection with Sixth street, but proceeded without slacking his speed across that street, and the collision between the two automobiles respiting in the death of plaintiff’s decedent occurred at this intersection. Had plaintiff’s decedent observed the traffic law, stopped at the intersection, or had he been driving within the limits fixed by statute as to speed in driving automobiles (1 Comp. Laws 1929, § 4697), the accident would not have happened. Under the undisputed facts plaintiff’s decedent was guilty of contributory negligence. The trial court was correct in directing a verdict for defendants.

Judgment affirmed, with costs.

Clark, C. J., and McDonald, Sharpe, North, Fead, Wiest, and Butzel, JJ., concurred.

How later courts describe this case

No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.

1939: 119392026peak 1939 · 1

Relies on it most ⓘ

  1. Lee v. City Brewing Corporation18 N.E.2d 628 (N.Y. 1939)

Most recent

  1. Lee v. City Brewing Corporation18 N.E.2d 628 (N.Y. 1939)

Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.

Authorities cited 0

No citations to other opinions in this database were found.

Keyboard shortcuts

/Focus the search box
j kNext / previous result
EnterOpen the selected result
xAdd / remove the selected result from the download list
n pNext / previous search term in a case
cCopy the citation of the current case
+ −Larger / smaller reading text
?Show this list