TaiLexi AI U.S. Case Law

17 Fair empl.prac.cas. 180, 16 Empl. Prac. Dec. P 8212 Henry H. Murphy v. American Motors Sales Corporation, Jerry S

17 Fair empl.prac.cas. 180, 16 Empl. Prac. Dec. P 8212 Henry H. Murphy v. American Motors Sales Corporation, Jerry S. Wilson v. American Motors Sales Corporation

17 Fair empl.prac.cas. 180, 16 Empl. Prac. Dec. P 8212 Henry H. Murphy v. Am. Motors Sales Corp., Jerry S, 570 F.2d 1226 (5th Cir. 1978)
Download
Format
Include

Star paging (*137) is kept for pin cites.

Court
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · U.S. Courts of Appeals
Decided
April 4, 1978
Docket
No. 76-2718
Citations
570 F.2d 1226

Opinion

570 F.2d 1226 17 Fair Empl.Prac.Cas. 180 , 16 Empl. Prac. Dec. P 8212 Henry H. MURPHY, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. AMERICAN MOTORS SALES CORPORATION, Defendant-Appellant. Jerry S. WILSON, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. AMERICAN MOTORS SALES CORPORATION, Defendant-Appellant.

Nos. 76-2718 and 76-2772.

United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.

April 4, 1978.

Charles H. Kirbo, Charles M. Shaffer, Jr., Atlanta, Ga., for defendant-appellant.

Vincent W. Roses, Jr., L. Burke Lewis, Atlanta, Ga., for plaintiffs-appellees.

Robert E. Williams, Washington, D. C., for amicus curiae Equal Employment Advisory Council.

Appeals from the United States District Court, Northern District of Georgia.

Before AINSWORTH and MORGAN, Circuit Judges, and LYNNE, District judge. *

PER CURIAM:

1

American Motors Sales Corporation has brought this interlocutory appeal from the trial court's ruling that an individual who brings a private action under the Age Discrimination in Employment Act of 1967, 29 U.S.C. § 621 , et seq. (ADEA), is entitled to recover punitive damages and to a trial by jury.

2

In Dean v. American Sec. Ins. Co., 559 F.2d 1036 (5th Cir. 1977), we definitively held that punitive damages are not recoverable in a private action brought under ADEA.

3

It is now settled that in such an action a trial by jury on a claim for lost wages is available where sought by one of the parties. Lorillard v. Pons, --- U.S. ----, 98 S.Ct. 866 , 55 L.Ed.2d 40 (1978).

4

The trial court's order overruling appellant's motion to strike the jury demand is affirmed; its order overruling appellant's motion to strike the prayer for punitive damages is reversed.

5

AFFIRMED IN PART.

6

REVERSED AND REMANDED IN PART.

* Senior District Judge of the Northern District of Alabama, sitting by designation

How later courts describe this case

No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.

Cited by 0 cases

No case in this database cites this case.

Authorities cited 3

DepthCaseCited by
Murphy v. Am. Motors Sales Corp., 570 F.2d 1226 (5th Cir. 1978) 9
Lorillard v. Pons, 434 U.S. 575 (1978) 1,266
Dean v. Am. Sec. Ins. Co., 559 F.2d 1036 (5th Cir. 1977) 128

Keyboard shortcuts

/Focus the search box
j kNext / previous result
EnterOpen the selected result
xAdd / remove the selected result from the download list
n pNext / previous search term in a case
cCopy the citation of the current case
+ −Larger / smaller reading text
?Show this list