TaiLexi AI U.S. Case Law

In re Assessment of Benefits

In Re Assessment of Benefits From Changing Grade, Grading, Paving and Improving of Robert and Other Streets. [Fn1]

In re Assessment of Benefits, 209 N.W. 632 (Minn. 1926)
Download
Format
Include

Star paging (*137) is kept for pin cites.

Court
Supreme Court of Minnesota · State Highest Courts
Decided
June 11, 1926
Docket
No. 25,225.
Judges
PER CURIAM.
Citations
209 N.W. 632167 Minn. 525

Opinion of the Court — Per Curiam

1 Reported in 209 N.W. 632 .

Appeal by certain objectors from a judgment of the district court of Ramsey county confirming assessments for street improvements. The case was here on appeal from an order denying their motion for a new trial and is reported in 164 Minn. 31 , 204 N.W. 558 .

So far as the questions now presented were before the court on the former appeal from the order denying a new trial, the decision on that appeal is the law of the case. There is no call for reconsideration. The appellants refer to a few matters which were not specifically discussed in the former opinion though they were not overlooked. We have considered all the matters presented by the assignments of error and all the contentions of appellants and in our view the judgment is without error.

Judgment affirmed.

*Page 1

How later courts describe this case

No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.

Cited by 0 cases

No case in this database cites this case.

Authorities cited 1

DepthCaseCited by
In re Assessment of Benefits From Changing Grade, Paving & Improving Robert & Other Streets, 204 N.W. 558 (Minn. 1925) 6

Keyboard shortcuts

/Focus the search box
j kNext / previous result
EnterOpen the selected result
xAdd / remove the selected result from the download list
n pNext / previous search term in a case
cCopy the citation of the current case
+ −Larger / smaller reading text
?Show this list