TaiLexi AI U.S. Case Law

State v. Zenzen

State v. Marjorie Zenzen. [Fn1]

State v. Zenzen, 227 N.W. 356 (Minn. 1929)
Download
Format
Include

Star paging (*137) is kept for pin cites.

Court
Supreme Court of Minnesota · State Highest Courts
Decided
November 1, 1929
Docket
No. 27,492.
Judges
Wilson
Citations
227 N.W. 356178 Minn. 3941929 Minn. LEXIS 1198

Opinion of the Court — Wilson

Wilson, C. J.

In this case a 16-year old girl was adjudged to be a delinquent child and she was ordered committed to the Hennepin County Home School for Girls until the further order of the court. The appeal is from an order denying a new trial. May a review be had by appeal ?

Juvenile delinquents are not criminals. Peterson v. McAuliffe, 151 Minn. 467 , 187 N. W. 226 ; G. S. 1923, § 8636, as amended, 2 Mason, 1927 , id. Proceedings involving juvenile delinquents are had pursuant to G. S. 1923, c. 73A, as amended, 2 Mason, 1927 , id. which fails to provide for an appeal. The legislature did not give that right. Unless such right is given expressly or by implication, it does not exist. It is not an inherent right. The right of appeal was unknown to the common law. Perhaps the legislature did not consider an appeal necessary. In such a proceeding the state intervenes primarily in the interest of the child and secondarily in the interest of society. The act does not provide machinery, for guard *395 ing the interest of the child upon an appeal. We think the character of the proceeding and the language of the statute lead to the conclusion that there is no appeal. The authorities so hold. 31 C. J. 1109; Van Leuven v. Ingham Circuit Judge, 166 Mich. 115 , 131 N. W. 531 ; Dinson v. Drosta, 39 Ind. App. 432 , 80 N. E. 32 ; Marlowe v. Commonwealth, 142 Ky. 106 , 133 S. W. 1137 ; State v. Bockman, 139 Tenn. 422 , 201 S. W. 741 ; People v. Piccolo, 275 Ill. 453 , 114 N. E. 145 ; Fowler v. Fowler, 24 Cal. App. 529 , 141 P. 1053 ; Ex parte Bartee, 76 Tex. Cr. 285, 174 S. W. 1051 ; Cullins v. Williams, 156 Ky. 57 , 160 S. W. 733 . Certiorari may be available. State ex rel. Williams v. Juvenile Court, 163 Minn. 312 , 204 N. W. 21 . Habeas corpus may be available. Peterson v. McAuliffe, 151 Minn. 467 , 187 N. W. 226 .

Appeal dismissed.

How later courts describe this case

No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.

1932: 11943: 11974: 21978: 119322026peak 1974 · 2

Relies on it most ⓘ

  1. Stolp v. Scrimshaw220 N.W.2d 811 (Minn. 1974)
  2. Appeal of O'Rourke220 N.W.2d 811 (Minn. 1974)
  3. In re Santillanes138 P.2d 503 (N.M. 1943)
  4. In re the Welfare of C. W. S.267 N.W.2d 496 (Minn. 1978)
  5. Bringgold v. Bringgold240 N.W. 120 (Minn. 1932)

Most recent

  1. In re the Welfare of C. W. S.267 N.W.2d 496 (Minn. 1978)
  2. Appeal of O'Rourke220 N.W.2d 811 (Minn. 1974)
  3. Stolp v. Scrimshaw220 N.W.2d 811 (Minn. 1974)
  4. In re Santillanes138 P.2d 503 (N.M. 1943)
  5. Bringgold v. Bringgold240 N.W. 120 (Minn. 1932)

Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.

Authorities cited 10

DepthCaseCited by
Peterson v. McAuliffe, 187 N.W. 226 (Minn. 1922) 14
Marlowe v. Commonwealth, 133 S.W. 1137 (Ky. Ct. App. 1911) 23
Cullins v. Williams, 160 S.W. 733 (Ky. Ct. App. 1913) 17
Dinson v. Drosta, 80 N.E. 32 (Ind. Ct. App. 1907) 11
State ex rel. Williams v. Juvenile Court, 204 N.W. 21 (Minn. 1925) 9
Van Leuven v. Ingham Circuit Judge, 131 N.W. 531 (Mich. 1911) 8
In re Fowler, 141 P. 1053 (Cal. Ct. App. 1914) 2
People v. Piccolo, 275 Ill. 453 (1916) 27
Ex Parte Bartee, 174 S.W. 1051 (Tex. Crim. App. 1915) 15
State v. Bockman, 139 Tenn. 422 (1917) 12

Keyboard shortcuts

/Focus the search box
j kNext / previous result
EnterOpen the selected result
xAdd / remove the selected result from the download list
n pNext / previous search term in a case
cCopy the citation of the current case
+ −Larger / smaller reading text
?Show this list