TaiLexi AI U.S. Case Law

In re Reinstatement of Gennow as Attorney at Law

In Re Reinstatement of Archie L. Gennow as an Attorney at Law. [Fn1]

In re Reinstatement of Gennow as Attorney at Law, 299 N.W. 683 (Minn. 1941)
Download
Format
Include

Star paging (*137) is kept for pin cites.

Court
Supreme Court of Minnesota · State Highest Courts
Decided
July 11, 1941
Docket
No. 31,373.
Judges
PER CURIAM.
Citations
299 N.W. 683210 Minn. 5931941 Minn. LEXIS 817

Opinion of the Court — Per Curiam

Per Curiam.

On the petition of Archie L. Gennow for reinstatement as an attorney at law in this state, it is ordered that said Gennow be reinstated as such attorney at law, this court, however, retaining jurisdiction of the proceedings during a probationary period of three years, during which, if said Gennow fails to put into his practice the standards fixed by the canons of ethics of the bar association, the board of law examiners may upon adequate notice to said Gennow apply to this court for a vacation of the order of reinstatement.

It is so ordered.

How later courts describe this case

No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.

1941: 119412026peak 1941 · 1

Relies on it most ⓘ

  1. Armstrong v. City of Rochester299 N.W. 683 (Minn. 1941)

Most recent

  1. Armstrong v. City of Rochester299 N.W. 683 (Minn. 1941)

Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.

Authorities cited 2

DepthCaseCited by
In re Disbarment of Archie L. Gennow, 289 N.W. 887 (Minn. 1939) 8
Armstrong v. City of Rochester, 299 N.W. 683 (Minn. 1941) 5

Keyboard shortcuts

/Focus the search box
j kNext / previous result
EnterOpen the selected result
xAdd / remove the selected result from the download list
n pNext / previous search term in a case
cCopy the citation of the current case
+ −Larger / smaller reading text
?Show this list