Harley Beverly Morris v. United States
Harley Beverly MORRIS, Appellant, v. UNITED STATES of America, Appellee
Opinion
PER CURIAM.
Harley Beverly Morris was convicted of two counts of knowingly receiving a firearm that was shipped in interstate commerce after he was convicted of a felony. 18 U.S.C. §§ 922 (h)(1), 924(a). On appeal, he argues that he was denied a fair trial because the trial court improperly interjected itself in the government’s behalf during the trial by: (1) instructing the prosecutor to ask certain questions during the government’s cross-examination of Morris, and (2) commenting on the evidence in his instructions to the jury.
We have carefully reviewed the cross-examination of Morris and find that the trial court did not exceed its proper role by becoming another advocate for the government.
See United States v. Gregory Date Lowe, No. 77-1680 (8th Cir. February 1, 1978);
United States v. McColgin, 535 F.2d 471, 474-475 (8th Cir.), cert. denied, 429 U.S. 853 , 97 S.Ct. 145 , 50 L.Ed.2d 128 (1976);
Kramer v. United States, 408 F.2d 837, 841 (8th Cir. 1969).
While the trial court’s comments on the evidence approached the limits of permissible comment, they did not exceed those limits.
See United States v. Brandom, 479 F.2d 830 (8th Cir. 1973);
Scruggs v. United States, 450 F.2d 359, 363 (8th Cir. 1971), cert. denied, 405 U.S. 1071 , 92 S.Ct. 1521 , 31 L.Ed.2d 804 (1972);
Weare v. United States, 1 F.2d 617, 618 (8th Cir. 1924).
The judgment of conviction is affirmed.
How later courts describe this case
No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.
Cited by 2 cases
View all citing references →Relies on it most ⓘ
Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.