TaiLexi AI U.S. Case Law

United States v. Albert C. Drebin, Budget Films, Inc., Lawrence S. Fine and Bruce M. Venezia

UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Albert C. DREBIN, Budget Films, Inc., Lawrence S. Fine and Bruce M. Venezia, Defendants-Appellants

United States v. Drebin, 572 F.2d 215 (9th Cir. 1978)
Download
Format
Include

Star paging (*137) is kept for pin cites.

Court
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · U.S. Courts of Appeals
Decided
May 15, 1978
Docket
No. 75-3475
Citations
572 F.2d 215

Opinion

ORDER Before CHAMBERS and KENNEDY, Circuit Judges, and JAMESON, * District Judge.

In a petition for rehearing appellants contend, inter alia, that agreements between Columbia Pictures and American Broadcasting Company for the right to televise “The Way We Were” (Count Six), “Forty Carats” (Count Eight), and “The Take” (Count Nine) are identical in their provisions to the agreement between the same parties for “Funny Girl”, (Count Seven) in United States v. Wise, 550 F.2d 1180 (9 Cir. 1977). It is true, as appellants contend, that each of these agreements contains as part of paragraph 9(a) the language: “At ABC’s election and cost a file-screening copy shall be retained notwithstanding subparagraph 9(c).” Here, as in Wise , there was no evidence as to whether ABC exercised its option, or, if it did, whether it resold that print. We held in Wise that in the absence of such proof the Government had failed in its burden of proving absence of a first sale.

This question was not raised in the district court or in the initial briefs filed by appellants in this court. We have had some difficulty in locating the agreements, but find they were introduced in evidence as exhibits. In view of the fact that the Government did not prove the source of appellants’ prints, but relied upon its proof that no first sales had been made to anyone, we are obliged to hold, as we did in Wise , *216 that there was a failure of proof with respect to these three films. It is necessary accordingly to reverse the convictions under Counts Six, Eight, and Nine and remand for a new trial on these counts. If the Government is unable to produce proof of the source of appellants’ prints of “The Way We Were,” “Forty Carats,” and “The Take,” these counts will be subject to dismissal.

In view of the reversal of the convictions on Counts Six, Eight, and Nine, it is necessary to remand also for resentencing.

The convictions on Counts One, Two, Three, Four, Five, Seven, and Ten 1

are affirmed; the convictions on Counts Six, Eight, and Nine are reversed. The cause is remanded for a new trial on the counts which are reversed and for resentencing on the counts which are affirmed.

The motion for leave to file appellants’ petition to reconsider their petition for rehearing and addendum thereto, filed herein on January 9, 1978, is denied.

* Honorable William J. Jameson, Senior United States District Judge for the District of Montana, sitting by designation.

1

. Appellants contend that the agreement for telecast of “The New Centurions” (Count Ten) was also identical in its provisions to the agreement for “Funny Girl” (Count Seven in United States v. Wise).

We find, however, that the agreement for “The New Centurions” did not contain the paragraph 9(a) language, quoted supra, but rather contained language similar to the agreement for “Camelot” (Count III in Wise), which was found to be a license and not a sale. 550 F.2d at 1191 .

How later courts describe this case

No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.

1979: 21981: 11983: 31984: 11990: 119792026peak 1983 · 3

Relies on it most ⓘ

  1. UNITED STATES of America v. Harold S. McCLINTOCK748 F.2d 1278 (9th Cir. 1984)
  2. United States v. Thomas Rettig, United States of America v. Gary Nowak589 F.2d 418 (9th Cir. 1979)
  3. United States v. Belmont715 F.2d 459 (9th Cir. 1983)
  4. Commonwealth v. Yourawski425 N.E.2d 298 (Mass. 1981)
  5. Virella v. United States750 F. Supp. 111 (S.D.N.Y. 1990)
  6. Blackie's House of Beef, Inc. v. Castillo480 F. Supp. 1078 (D.D.C. 1979)

Most recent

  1. Virella v. United States750 F. Supp. 111 (S.D.N.Y. 1990)
  2. UNITED STATES of America v. Harold S. McCLINTOCK748 F.2d 1278 (9th Cir. 1984)
  3. United States v. Tomlinson574 F. Supp. 1531 (D. Wyo. 1983)
  4. United States v. John Belmont, United States of America v715 F.2d 459 (9th Cir. 1983)
  5. United States v. Belmont715 F.2d 459 (9th Cir. 1983)
  6. Commonwealth v. Yourawski425 N.E.2d 298 (Mass. 1981)

Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.

Authorities cited 1

DepthCaseCited by
United States v. Wise, 550 F.2d 1180 (9th Cir. 1977) 48

Keyboard shortcuts

/Focus the search box
j kNext / previous result
EnterOpen the selected result
xAdd / remove the selected result from the download list
n pNext / previous search term in a case
cCopy the citation of the current case
+ −Larger / smaller reading text
?Show this list