TaiLexi AI U.S. Case Law

Hanson v. State

Hanson v. State.

Hanson v. State, 164 So. 9 (Miss. 1935)
Download
Format
Include

Star paging (*137) is kept for pin cites.

Court
Mississippi Supreme Court · State Highest Courts
Decided
November 11, 1935
Docket
No. 31893.
Judges
Griffith
Citations
164 So. 9174 Miss. 881935 Miss. LEXIS 55

Opinion of the Court — Griffith

Griffith, J., delivered the opinion of the court.

Under a search warrant duly issued by a competent judicial officer, a search was made of the premises of appellant and there a large quantity of whisky and gin was *90 found. The liquors were seized, the appellant was arrested and placed in jail. Thereafter he gave bond and was released. He was indicted by the grand jury. Upon the trial under the indictment he was convicted, and on this appeal he contends that the search warrant was void, the search illegal, and that the evidence thereby obtained was inadmissible.

■ The point presented is that the search warrant was made returnable before the circuit judge. We are of opinion that' the objection is not sustainable. There are two objects in making a search warrant returnable before a competent officer or court: First, that the accused may have ready opportunity to give bond if arrested under the search warrant, or to obtain a speedy trial if unable to give bond; and, second, to have a remedy for the recovery of the property seized under the search warrant, if entitled thereto. As pointed out in Bufkin v. State, 134 Miss. 1, 19 , 98 So. 452 , the second reason disappears, for there was no property in the liquors seized under the .•circumstances shown in this case. Sections 1979, 2013, Code 1930'.

As to the first object or purpose, a circuit judge as conservator of the peace may fix the bond in such a case when returnable before him, or if the accused be unable to give bond, the judge may order the accused to be forthwith carried before any justice of the peace for trial. See sections 1320'-1324, Code 1930'. Moreover, we think this case, in principle, has already been decided in Watkins v. State, 158 Miss. 339 , 130 So. 477 .

This renders it unnecessary to- consider the respectable line of cases which hold that the admissibility of the evidence obtained under a search warrant depends upon the authority of the officer at the time the search was made, and not upon any error or omission in respect to the return.

Affirmed.

How later courts describe this case

No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.

Cited by 0 cases

No case in this database cites this case.

Authorities cited 2

DepthCaseCited by
Bufkin v. State, 98 So. 452 (Miss. 1923) 17
Watkins v. State, 130 So. 477 (Miss. 1930) 1

Keyboard shortcuts

/Focus the search box
j kNext / previous result
EnterOpen the selected result
xAdd / remove the selected result from the download list
n pNext / previous search term in a case
cCopy the citation of the current case
+ −Larger / smaller reading text
?Show this list