TaiLexi AI U.S. Case Law

Simpson County v. Furlow

Simpson County v. Furlow.

Simpson Cnty. v. Furlow, 134 So. 146 (Miss. 1931)
Download
Format
Include

Star paging (*137) is kept for pin cites.

Court
Mississippi Supreme Court · State Highest Courts
Decided
May 4, 1931
Docket
No. 29437.
Judges
McG-owen
Citations
134 So. 146160 Miss. 2321931 Miss. LEXIS 184

Opinion of the Court — McG-owen

*234 McG-owen, J., delivered the opinion of thé court.

In a court of a justice of the peace, Furlow, the appellee, filed a written statement of his cause of action as follows:

“Simpson county, state of Mississippi, and'the board of supervisors of said county.

“In account with E. Furlow.

For the killing of one horse in process of dip- , ping.................................... $200.00' For the killing of one yearling in process ...... $ 10.00 210.00 “E. Furlow By J. P. & A. K. Edwards, Attorneys.”

Judgment upon which was entered for one hundred ten dollars. The case was submitted to a jury in the justice court, and,' from the record, appears to be a single suit or cause of action.' It will be observed that the sum total of the items sued for is two hundred ten dollars, which is in excess of two hundred dollars. The county appealed to the circuit court, and there was a motion- made to dismiss the -case, because the justice of1 the peace was without jurisdiction. There is nothing in this record, nor in the account filed, to indicate that this is not a single cause of action. Oh the other hand, only one judgment was rendered for one hundred ten dollars on this cause of action. The court overruled the motion to dismiss the cause, thereby holding that the justice of the peace *235 had jurisdiction thereof. Thereafter counsel for appellee made a statement to the court as to some agreement between counsel^ made at the date of the trial in the justice court, about trying two cases. There does not appear to be two cases, and in determining jurisdiction, in the absence of fraud, the pleadings filed showing the amount demanded in good faith, fixed the principal amount in controversy as contemplated by section 2071, Code 1930.

The justice of the peace had no jurisdiction of this cause, and the court below should have sustained the motion to dismiss the same without prejudice to the right of the appellee to bring another action. The case will be reversed, and judgment will be entered here dismissing said cause without prejudice.

Reversed, and judgment here for appellant dismissing this cause.

How later courts describe this case

No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.

Cited by 0 cases

No case in this database cites this case.

Authorities cited 0

No citations to other opinions in this database were found.

Keyboard shortcuts

/Focus the search box
j kNext / previous result
EnterOpen the selected result
xAdd / remove the selected result from the download list
n pNext / previous search term in a case
cCopy the citation of the current case
+ −Larger / smaller reading text
?Show this list