McQueen v. USA
Alvy T. MCQUEEN, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. UNITED STATES of America; Et Al., Defendants, United States of America; United States Department of Justice, Including Its Named Components; United States Department of Treasury, Including Its Component Internal Revenue Service; Susie M. Wong; Mark W. Hughes; Crispin L. Smith; Angelo A. Fratttarelli, Defendants-Appellees
Opinion
PER CURIAM:
* Alvy McQueen asserts a statutory action against the United States and a Bivens action against various government employees. The district court entered summary judgment for defendants, and McQueen appeals.
We have reviewed the briefs and pertinent portions of the record and have heard the arguments of counsel. We affirm, essentially for the reasons given by the district court. In summary, the statutory action is barred by limitations, and the district court committed no reversible error in finding immunity on the Bivens actions.
*965 The district court properly denied McQueen a waiver of fees regarding his FOIA request. If, however, McQueen is willing to pay the fees, he is not barred from pursuing a FOIA request.
It is time for this aged litigation to be put to bed. The judgment is AFFIRMED.
* Pursuant to 5th Cir. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set fort in 5th Cir. •R. 47.5.4.
How later courts describe this case
No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.
Cited by 5 cases
View all citing references →Relies on it most ⓘ
Most recent
Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.