State ex rel. Barber v. Daues
The State Ex Rel. Berno C. Barber v. Charles H. Daues Et Al., Judges of St. Louis Court of Appeals
Opinion of the Court
BLAIR, J.
— Certiorari to the St. Louis Court of Appeals. . It is sought to quash the opinion of respondents in the case of Berno C. Barber v. American Car & Foundry Company, decided by respondents, July 5, 1927, because of alleged conflict between said opinion and controlling decisions of this court.
The same questions are involved in this case as were involved in the companion case of State ex rel. Hopkins v. Daues, ante, page 733, this day decided.
The conclusions reached by us in that casé require us to quash the opinion of respondents in this case. It is so ordered.
All concur, except Graves, J., absent.
How later courts describe this case
Explanatory parentheticals written by citing courts — 1 in all; the most informative distinct ones are shown.
-
(holding that the defendant was entitled to an instruction on manslaughter where some evidence showed that he witnessed the deceased slap his wife and knock her down and heard her call for help)
Cited by 4 cases
View all citing references →Relies on it most ⓘ
Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.