Starks v. Lusk
HENRY LOUISA STARKS v. JAMES W. LUSK, Et Al., Appellants
Headnotes
Summary
Syllabus and headnotes are prepared by the reporter or publisher, not the court, and are not part of the opinion.
Opinion of the Court
BOND, C. J.
This case is fully stated and elaborately discussed in the majority and dissenting opinions of the Springfield Court of Appeals (187:'S. W. 586 et seq).
After a careful examination of the facts as shown in the record, we are satisfied that a correct conclusion was reached in the majority opinion. We therefore approve the majority opinion of the Springfield Court of Appeals.
The judgment of the circuit court is, therefore, affirmed. It is._ so ordered.
All concur, except Goode and Graves, JJ., who dissent;
Woodson, J., absent.
How later courts describe this case
No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.
Cited by 4 cases
View all citing references →Relies on it most ⓘ
Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.