TaiLexi AI U.S. Case Law

Baker v. Massey Harris Co.

Estella Joyner Baker, Defendant in Error, v. Massey Harris Company and Zurich General Accident and Liability Insurance Company, Plaintiffs in Error

Baker v. Massey Harris Co., 49 S.W.2d 1060 (Mo. Ct. App. 1932)
Download
Format
Include

Star paging (*137) is kept for pin cites.

Court
Missouri Court of Appeals · State Appellate Courts
Decided
May 23, 1932
Judges
Boyer, Campbell
Citations
49 S.W.2d 1060227 Mo. App. 301932 Mo. App. LEXIS 104

Opinion of the Court

The Workmen's Compensation Commission on January 16, 1930, made an award in favor of Estella Joyner Baker, defendant in error, and against Massey Harris Company and Zurich General Accident Liability Insurance Company, plaintiffs in error. The plaintiffs in error appealed from the award to the circuit court of Jackson county. Upon hearing of the appeal the award of the commission was, on September 10, 1930, affirmed. Plaintiffs in error now seek to have reviewed upon writ of error, the judgment of the circuit court affirming the award of the commission.

In the view we take of the case, further statement is unnecessary. *Page 31

It has been determined that a judgment based upon the Workmen's Compensation Act cannot be reviewed upon writ of error. [Wheat v. Globe Indemnity Company, 44 S.W.2d 168 ; Kristanik v. Motor Company, 41 S.W.2d 911 ; Daniels v. Box Company, 46 S.W.2d 1108 .]

It follows that we are without jurisdiction to review the judgment of the circuit court affirming the award of the commission. The writ of error is dismissed. The commissioner so recommends. Boyer, C., concurs.

Addendum — Per Curiam

The foregoing opinion of CAMPBELL, C., is adopted as the opinion of the court. The writ of error is dismissed. All concur.

How later courts describe this case

No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.

1935: 119352026peak 1935 · 1

Relies on it most ⓘ

  1. State v. Barbata80 S.W.2d 865 (Mo. 1935)

Most recent

  1. State v. Barbata80 S.W.2d 865 (Mo. 1935)

Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.

Authorities cited 2

DepthCaseCited by
Kristanik v. Chevrolet Motor Co., 41 S.W.2d 911 (Mo. Ct. App. 1931) 5
Wheat v. Globe Indem. Co., 44 S.W.2d 168 (Mo. Ct. App. 1931) 1

Keyboard shortcuts

/Focus the search box
j kNext / previous result
EnterOpen the selected result
xAdd / remove the selected result from the download list
n pNext / previous search term in a case
cCopy the citation of the current case
+ −Larger / smaller reading text
?Show this list