Jewel Companies, Inc. v. The Westhall Company, D/B/A Jewel Mart
JEWEL COMPANIES, INC., Plaintiff-Appellant, v. the WESTHALL COMPANY, D/B/A Jewel Mart, Defendant-Appellee
Opinion
PER CURIAM.
Plaintiff-Appellee Jewel Companies, Inc., filed this action for injunctive and compensatory relief against The Westhall Company, d/b/a Jewel Mart, alleging that defendant’s use of the word “Jewel” in its Jewel Mart stores unfairly infringed upon appellant’s “Jewel Home Shopping Service.” District Judge Thomas D. Lambros entered judgment in favor of the defendant. Reference is made to the comprehensive opinion of the district court for a recitation of pertinent facts.
Jewel Companies, Inc. v. The Westhall Co., 413 F.Supp. 994 (N.D. Ohio 1976).
Upon consideration of the briefs and oral arguments, and the entire record, the court concludes that the findings of fact of the district court are not clearly erroneous, Fed. R.Civ.P. 52(a), and that no reversible error is disclosed by the record.
Accordingly, the judgment of the district court is affirmed.
How later courts describe this case
No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.
Cited by 11 cases
View all citing references →Relies on it most ⓘ
- Hindu Incense v. Charles Meadows and Dorothy Meadows
- Ameritech, Inc., an Ohio Corporation v. American Information Technologies Corporation, a Delaware Corporation, D/B/A Ameritech
- Worthington Foods, Inc. v. Kellogg Co.
- Cesare v. Work
- Cincinnati Sub-Zero Products, Inc. v. Augustine Medical, Inc.
- Diamond Co. v. Gentry Acquisition Corp.
Most recent
- Re/Max International, Inc. v. Realty One, Inc.
- Cincinnati Sub-Zero Products, Inc. v. Augustine Medical, Inc.
- Worthington Foods, Inc. v. Kellogg Co.
- Barrios v. American Thermal Instruments, Inc.
- Diamond Co. v. Gentry Acquisition Corp.
- Ameritech, Inc., an Ohio Corporation v. American Information Technologies Corporation, a Delaware Corporation, D/B/A Ameritech
Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.