TaiLexi AI U.S. Case Law

Ex Parte Newland

EX PARTE DON NEWLAND, Petitioner

Ex Parte Newland, 267 S.W. 809 (Mo. 1924)
Download
Format
Include

Star paging (*137) is kept for pin cites.

Court
Supreme Court of Missouri · State Highest Courts
Decided
December 30, 1924
Judges
Graves, Walker
Citations
267 S.W. 809306 Mo. 3091924 Mo. LEXIS 560

Opinion of the Court — Graves

GRAVES, C. J.

This is really an application via habeas corpus to fix an appeal bond. The facts are not seriously in dispute. Petitioner was charged with attempted burglary in the second degree, and of such offense was, by the Circuit Court of Jackson County, found guilty, and sentenced to two years imprisonment in the penitentiary. The charge in the petition for our writ, which stands undenied, reads:

“Tour petitioner says that said imprisonment is illegal in this, to-wit: That after his conviction by the jury aforesaid, at the same term of the court and within the statutory time, he filed his motions for a new trial and in arrest of judgment; that said motions were by the court overruled, and sentence passed upon him as hereinbefore set out; that he duly filed his affidavit for *311 appeal from the verdict and judgment of said Circuit Court of Jackson County, and the same was allowed by said court to the Supreme Court of Missouri; that he was allowed until on or before -the last day of the November term, 1924, in which to file his bill of exceptions; that he was further allowed to prosecute his appeal as a poor person; that although application was duly made by your petitioner to the Circuit Court of Jackson County, to fix the amount of his appeal bond, the judge of said Circuit Court of Jackson County, failed and refused to either grant the motion in arrest of judgment, or to fix any appeal bond, and directed that your petitioner be transmitted to the penitentiary of this State; your petitioner further represents that he is now able and willing to give such appeal bond in such reasonable amount as this court may deem just and proper. ’ ’

The trial court evidently proceeded upon the theory that it was within the discretion of the trial court to grant or refuse a supersedeas.

This man was convicted and given two years. A good and sufficient bond for $2000 should suffice. There are no special circumstances calling for anything out of the ordinary. The second paragraph in Ex parte Frank Carey, ante, page 287, fully covers the law of this case, and the law of- the State. Bond is fixed at the sum of $2000, the qualifications of the sureties to be passed upon by the trial judge, who shall certify the result of his investigation to this court, the bond to be ultimately approved by this court.

All concur, except Walker, J absent.

How later courts describe this case

No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.

1925: 11926: 21938: 11954: 119252026peak 1926 · 2

Relies on it most ⓘ

  1. State v. Saussele265 S.W.2d 290 (Mo. 1954)
  2. State v. Wright112 S.W.2d 571 (Mo. 1938)
  3. State v. Adams289 S.W. 948 (Mo. 1926)
  4. State ex rel. Hulen v. Trimble275 S.W. 536 (Mo. 1925)
  5. State v. Bell289 S.W. 619 (Mo. 1926)

Most recent

  1. State v. Saussele265 S.W.2d 290 (Mo. 1954)
  2. State v. Wright112 S.W.2d 571 (Mo. 1938)
  3. State v. Bell289 S.W. 619 (Mo. 1926)
  4. State v. Adams289 S.W. 948 (Mo. 1926)
  5. State ex rel. Hulen v. Trimble275 S.W. 536 (Mo. 1925)

Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.

Authorities cited 0

No citations to other opinions in this database were found.

Keyboard shortcuts

/Focus the search box
j kNext / previous result
EnterOpen the selected result
xAdd / remove the selected result from the download list
n pNext / previous search term in a case
cCopy the citation of the current case
+ −Larger / smaller reading text
?Show this list