TaiLexi AI U.S. Case Law

Melvin Clifford Winestock v. Immigration and Naturalization Service

Melvin Clifford WINESTOCK, Petitioner, v. IMMIGRATION AND NATURALIZATION SERVICE, Respondent

Winestock v. Immigration & Naturalization Serv., 576 F.2d 234 (9th Cir. 1978)
Download
Format
Include

Star paging (*137) is kept for pin cites.

Court
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · U.S. Courts of Appeals
Decided
June 2, 1978
Docket
No. 77-3251
Judges
Chambers, Kilkenny, Tang
Citations
576 F.2d 2341978 U.S. App. LEXIS 10909

Opinion — Chambers

CHAMBERS, Circuit Judge:

Petitioner, a visitor from Canada, has been ordered deported for his conviction of dealing with counterfeit obligations, in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 473 .

* The conviction was for an offense committed within five years of his entry into this county. The sole question is whether violation of this statute constituted a “crime involving moral turpitude” and was thus a deportable offense under 8 U.S.C. § 1251 (a)(4).

Count II of the indictment, to which petitioner pleaded guilty, charges that he “sold, transferred and delivered counterfeit securities of the United States, that is 896 $100 Federal Reserve Notes . . . with the intent that the same be passed, published or used as true and genuine . . . .”

A crime having as an element the intent to defraud is clearly a crime involving moral turpitude.

Jordan v. deGeorge, 341 U.S. 223 , 71 S.Ct. 703 , 95 L.Ed. 886 (1951). The intent to defraud may be explicit in the statutory definition of the crime, e. g. Section 472 of Title 18, which deals with passing, uttering, publishing, mailing or possessing counterfeit obligations “with intent to defraud.” Violation of Section 472 is a crime involving moral turpitude.

Lozano-Giron v. Immigration and Naturalization Service, 506 F.2d 1073 (7th Cir. 1974);

United States v. Wilkerson, 469 F.2d 963 (5th Cir. 1972).

The intent to defraud may also be implicit in the nature of the crime. Section 473 does not include the identical statutory words of intent to defraud. Instead, it requires an intent to pass off, as genuine, obligations that are in fact counterfeit. Knowledge of the counterfeit nature of the obligations is an essential element of the crime (United States v. DiZenzo, 500 F.2d 263 (4th Cir. 1974)) and petitioner admitted all the elements of the crime by his guilty plea. He has admitted intending to pass off something valueless as being something of value. We have difficulty distinguishing such intent from a general intent to defraud. Implicit in the crime is the deception of the United States and also any person into whose hands the obligations come once they are put into circulation.

Petitioner’s violation of Section 473 was the commission of a crime involving moral turpitude within the meaning of 8 U.S.C. § 1251 (a)(4).

Affirmed.

* “Whoever buys, sells, exchanges, transfers, receives, or delivers any false, forged, counterfeited, or altered obligations or other security of the United States, with the intent that the same be passed, published, or used as true and genuine, shall be fined not more than $5,000 or imprisoned not more than ten years, or both.”

How later courts describe this case

Explanatory parentheticals written by citing courts — 5 in all; the most informative distinct ones are shown.

Cited by 28 cases

View all citing references →
1980: 11982: 21985: 11988: 11991: 11992: 21993: 11995: 41996: 22000: 12002: 12003: 12004: 22005: 22007: 22008: 22011: 12019: 119802026peak 1995 · 4

Relies on it most ⓘ

  1. Navarro-Lopez v. Gonzales503 F.3d 1063 (9th Cir. 2007)
  2. Myrisia Franklin v. Immigration and Naturalization Service72 F.3d 571 (8th Cir. 1996)
  3. Myrisia Franklin v. INSNo. 94-3609 (8th Cir. Dec. 11, 1995)
  4. Nir Goldeshtein v. Immigration and Naturalization Service8 F.3d 645 (9th Cir. 1993)
  5. Andrew Robert Leslie McNaughton v. Immigration and Naturalization Service612 F.2d 457 (9th Cir. 1980)
  6. United States v. Chu Kong Yin, AKA Alfred Chu935 F.2d 990 (9th Cir. 1991)

Most recent

  1. Mohammad Bashar v. William P. BarrNo. 14-74049 (9th Cir. Feb. 15, 2019)
  2. RODRIGUEZ-VALENCIA v. Holder652 F.3d 1157 (9th Cir. 2011)
  3. Quinonez-Orozco v. Mukasey270 F. App'x 527 (9th Cir. 2008)
  4. Blanco v. Mukasey518 F.3d 714 (9th Cir. 2008)
  5. Navarro-Lopez v. Gonzales503 F.3d 1063 (9th Cir. 2007)
  6. Hernandez-Perez v. Gonzales241 F. App'x 430 (9th Cir. 2007)

Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.

Authorities cited 4

DepthCaseCited by
Jordan v. De George, 341 U.S. 223 (1951) 785
United States v. Dizenzo, 500 F.2d 263 (4th Cir. 1974) 38
United States v. Wilkerson, 469 F.2d 963 (5th Cir. 1972) 20
Uldarico Lozano-Giron v. Immigration & Naturalization Serv., 506 F.2d 1073 (7th Cir. 1974) 18

Keyboard shortcuts

/Focus the search box
j kNext / previous result
EnterOpen the selected result
xAdd / remove the selected result from the download list
n pNext / previous search term in a case
cCopy the citation of the current case
+ −Larger / smaller reading text
?Show this list