TaiLexi AI U.S. Case Law

United States v. Corinne Ann Santiago

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. CORINNE ANN SANTIAGO CORINNE ANN SANTIAGO, Appellant

United States v. Santiago, 576 F.2d 562 (3d Cir. 1978)
Download
Format
Include

Star paging (*137) is kept for pin cites.

Court
Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · U.S. Courts of Appeals
Decided
May 9, 1978
Docket
No. 78-1079
Judges
Gibbons, Garth, Higginbotham
Citations
576 F.2d 56215 V.I. 6091978 U.S. App. LEXIS 11262

Opinion — Per Curiam

OPINION OF THE COURT PER CURIAM:

The appellant, Corinne Ann Santiago, pleaded guilty to a charge of possessing cocaine with intent to distribute, in violation of 21 U.S.C. § 841 (a)(1). She was sentenced under 18 U.S.C. § 4205 (c) (1976 ed.). After a report was prepared pursuant to that statute, she received a final sentence of 18 months of confinement, with the execution of all but six months suspended.

If Santiago had been convicted by a United States District Court sitting within the territorial limits of the states, she would have been eligible for sentencing under the Federal Youth Corrections Act. 18 U.S.C. § 5005 et seq. However, that Act applies only in the states of the United States and in the District of Columbia. 18 U.S.C. § 5024 . Santiago contends that Congress’ failure to extend the benefits of that Act to youths convicted of violating federal law in the territories of the United States deprives her *611 of equal protection of the laws as required by the due process clause of the fifth amendment. That constitutional amendment was made applicable to the Virgin Islands by the Revised Organic Act of the Virgin Islands. Pub. L. No. 90-496, § 11 , 82 Stat. 841 (amending 48 U.S.C. § 1561 ).

However, Section 11 of the Organic Act did not make all federal statutes uniformly applicable to the Virgin Islands. Moreover, Congress is not obliged to extend the provisions of every federal statute to the territories. Downes v. Bidwell, 182 U.S. 244 (1901). In this instance Congress has declined to extend the Youth Corrections Act to the territories, including the Virgin Islands. The judgment appealed from will be affirmed.

How later courts describe this case

No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.

1981: 11989: 119812026peak 1981 · 1

Relies on it most ⓘ

  1. Government of the Virgin Islands v. Robert Dowling866 F.2d 610 (3d Cir. 1989)
  2. United States v. Anthony J. Tursi655 F.2d 26 (1st Cir. 1981)

Most recent

  1. Government of the Virgin Islands v. Robert Dowling866 F.2d 610 (3d Cir. 1989)
  2. United States v. Anthony J. Tursi655 F.2d 26 (1st Cir. 1981)

Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.

Authorities cited 1

DepthCaseCited by
Downes v. Bidwell, 182 U.S. 244 (1901) 375

Keyboard shortcuts

/Focus the search box
j kNext / previous result
EnterOpen the selected result
xAdd / remove the selected result from the download list
n pNext / previous search term in a case
cCopy the citation of the current case
+ −Larger / smaller reading text
?Show this list