Elko-Tuscarora Mercantile Co. v. Wines
The ELKO-TUSCARORA MERCANTILE COMPANY, Respondent, v. IRA D. WINES and LEN WINES, Appellants
Headnotes
Summary
Syllabus and headnotes are prepared by the reporter or publisher, not the court, and are not part of the opinion.
Opinion of the Court
The facts sufficiently appear in the opinion. This appeal is from a final judgment.
The notice of appeal was filed on the 14th day of October, 1897, and the same was served or attempted to be served on the same day. The judgment was not rendered till the 3d day of November, 1897. Respondent moves the court to dismiss the appeal upon several grounds, one of which is that the notice of appeal was filed and served, if served at all, before the rendition of the judgment.
An appeal may be taken from a final judgment within one year after the rendition of the judgment. (Gen. Stats. 3352.)
Such appeal taken before the rendition of the judgment will be dismissed. (Ency. Pl. Pr. 248; McLaughlin v. Doherty, 54 Cal. 519 .) Many other authorities might be cited to the same effect.
The appeal is dismissed on the ground above specified.
It is not material to pass upon the other grounds on which the motion is based.
Concurrence
I concur.
MASSEY, J., being an attorney in the case in the court below, did not participate in this decision.
How later courts describe this case
No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.
Cited by 5 cases
View all citing references →Relies on it most ⓘ
Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.