Corliss v. Worcester, Nashua & Rochester Railroad
Corliss v. the Worcester, Nashua & Rochester Railroad
Headnotes
Summary
Syllabus and headnotes are prepared by the reporter or publisher, not the court, and are not part of the opinion.
Opinion of the Court
Bingham, J.
The court ruled that only nominal damages could be recovered.
At common law the cause of action died with the decedent, but by chapter thirty-five of the Laws of 1879, it survives to his administratrix, and she may have damages assessed if the liability of the defendant is established.
Clark v. Manchester, 62 N. H. —;
Needham v. Railroad, 38 Vt. 294, 302 .
The ordinary grounds of damage in such cases are the expense of board, nursing, medical aid, compensation for loss of time, physical and mental pain, including such sum as the jury think ought to be given on account of distress or anxiety of mind experienced *405 in view of approaching death while in imminent danger from the injury received, and to the close of life.
Such damages are not necessarily nominal. What they should be depends upon the varying facts of each particular case, and are for the jury to assess, guided by the instructions of the court as to the law.- Exception sustained.
All concurred.
How later courts describe this case
No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.
Cited by 2 cases
View all citing references →Relies on it most ⓘ
Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.