Spalding v. Brooks
Spalding v. Brooks & A.
Headnotes
Summary
Syllabus and headnotes are prepared by the reporter or publisher, not the court, and are not part of the opinion.
Opinion of the Court
Stanley, J.
It was enough for the court to state the general rule as to what'constituted undue influence, and leave it to the jury to apply the law given them by the court to the specific facts proved.
The court are not bound to illustrate and apply the general principle on this subject by and to particular parts of the evidence. The result of such a course would be to give undue prominence to some portions of the evidence, and thus lead the minds of the jury away from the main question at issue. It was the duty of counsel, in the argument, to call the attention of the jury to the evidence bearing upon the issue, and to make such comments on it as would tend to sustain the position they took.
The instructions in this case were sufficient, and there was no error in refusing to give those asked for by the defendants.
Motion denied.
Bingham, J., did not sit.
How later courts describe this case
No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.
Cited by 1 case
View all citing references →Relies on it most ⓘ
Most recent
Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.