Drews' Appeals
Drews' Appeals.
Headnotes
Summary
Syllabus and headnotes are prepared by the reporter or publisher, not the court, and are not part of the opinion.
Opinion of the Court
Allen, J.
Administration of an intestate estate, when there is no widow, is granted to “ any of the next of kin, or such suitable person as they may nominate.” No person is appointed who is deemed “ incapable.” No stranger is appointed until the next of kin renounce the trust in writing, or neglect for thirty days to apply for it. Gen. St., c. 176, ss.
2, 8, 5. When any one of the next of kin is a suitable person, a stranger is not appointed.
Munsey v. Webster, 24 N. H. 126, 127.
The word “ incapable” cannot be limited in its application to the mere case of mental or physical incapacity, but must be understood to include the idea of unfitness, unsuitableness. The use of the word “ suitable”in the second section of the statute referred to, and the remark of the court in Munsey v. Webster that the next of kin must be taken to be a suitable person, favor this construction. An interest that disqualifies one from fairly considering the interest and claims of another in the same matter, renders him unsuitable to be intrusted with its management; and a feeling of hostility, so intense as to cause on,e to resist with personal violence the claims and rights of others held in common with him, not only renders him unfit for, but also practically incapable of, managing the common interest. The claim of Sarah Drew against the estate is seriously disputed by the other heirs. The interest which the claim gives her in the settlement of the *321 estate, and the feeling engendered by the dispute, render her incapable of properly executing the trust of administrator. The feelings of bitter hostility on the part of Gerrish made him equally unfit for the place. The law does not encourage a private or family feud. Neither of the contending parties should be entrusted with the power of administration, because there is reason to fear their animosity would lead to an abuse of the trust.
The appeals of Gerrish and Sarah Drew from the decree appointing John McDaniel administrator are dismissed, and the decree is affirmed, with costs to the appellee. The appeal of Gerrish from the decree appointing Sarah is sustained, and that decree is reversed, with costs to the appellant.
How later courts describe this case
No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.
Cited by 1 case
View all citing references →Relies on it most ⓘ
Most recent
Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.