State v. Shaw
State v. Shaw.
Headnotes
Summary
Syllabus and headnotes are prepared by the reporter or publisher, not the court, and are not part of the opinion.
Opinion of the Court
Doe, C. J.
Section 5 of c. 8, Laws of 1875, authorizing all registered pharmacists “ to keep spirituous liquors for compounding their medicines,” does not authorize them to sell spirituous liquor not mixed with medicine. The defendant’s testimony proved the offence charged in the indictment. His guilt and the correctness of the general verdict being established by his own testimony, it is not necessary to consider his exception to the exclusion of his certificate, or his exception to the instructions which required the jury to answer certain questions.
Judgment on the verdict.
How later courts describe this case
No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.
Cited by 1 case
View all citing references →Relies on it most ⓘ
Most recent
Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.