TaiLexi AI U.S. Case Law

Aldrich v. Whitaker

Aldrich & A., Adm’rs, v. Whitaker & A.

Aldrich v. Whitaker, 47 A. 591 (N.H. 1900)
Download
Format
Include

Star paging (*137) is kept for pin cites.

Court
Supreme Court of New Hampshire · State Highest Courts
Decided
June 5, 1900
Judges
Young, Parsons
Citations
47 A. 59170 N.H. 627
Summary
Bill in Equity, to foreclose a mortgage given by the defendants to the plaintiffs’ testator to secure their joint note. Trial by the court. Subject to exception, the defendants were permitted to show that there was no consideration for the note. The court found that the note was without consideration and ordered the bill dismissed, and the plaintiffs excepted.

Syllabus and headnotes are prepared by the reporter or publisher, not the court, and are not part of the opinion.

Opinion of the Court — Young

Young, J.

The question the plaintiffs have discussed is not in the case, for this is an action to collect a note. Want of consideration is a defence to such an action when it is brought by the original payee of the note or his personal representatives (Murray v. Whitcomb, 58 N. H. 50), and may be shown by parol evidence.

Bigelow v. Bigelow, 93 Me. 439 . No question of law is raised by the other exception.

Sxceptions overruled.

Parsons, J., did not sit: the others concurred.

How later courts describe this case

No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.

Cited by 0 cases

No case in this database cites this case.

Authorities cited 1

DepthCaseCited by
Bigelow v. Bigelow, 45 A. 513 (Me. 1900) 8

Keyboard shortcuts

/Focus the search box
j kNext / previous result
EnterOpen the selected result
xAdd / remove the selected result from the download list
n pNext / previous search term in a case
cCopy the citation of the current case
+ −Larger / smaller reading text
?Show this list