Aldrich v. Whitaker
Aldrich & A., Adm’rs, v. Whitaker & A.
Summary
Syllabus and headnotes are prepared by the reporter or publisher, not the court, and are not part of the opinion.
Opinion of the Court
Young, J.
The question the plaintiffs have discussed is not in the case, for this is an action to collect a note. Want of consideration is a defence to such an action when it is brought by the original payee of the note or his personal representatives (Murray v. Whitcomb, 58 N. H. 50), and may be shown by parol evidence.
Bigelow v. Bigelow, 93 Me. 439 . No question of law is raised by the other exception.
Sxceptions overruled.
Parsons, J., did not sit: the others concurred.
How later courts describe this case
No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.
Cited by 0 cases
No case in this database cites this case.