TaiLexi AI U.S. Case Law

Goodwin v. Colby

Goodwin, Ex'r, v. Colby & A.

Goodwin v. Colby, 13 A. 866 (N.H. 1887)
Download
Format
Include

Star paging (*137) is kept for pin cites.

Court
Supreme Court of New Hampshire · State Highest Courts
Decided
December 5, 1887
Judges
Allen
Citations
13 A. 86664 N.H. 401
Headnotes
By statute, an heir in the descending line, of a legatee named in a will, takes the legacy, which, at common law, would have fallen into the residuum by the death of the legatee before the testator.
Summary
Bill in Equity, by the executor of the last will of John San-born, asking direction as to the payment of certain legacies, where the legatees died in the lifetime of the testator.

Syllabus and headnotes are prepared by the reporter or publisher, not the court, and are not part of the opinion.

Opinion of the Court — Allen

Allen, J.

At common law, when the legatee dies before the testator the legacy lapses and falls into the residuum. 2 Will. Ex. 1084; 1 Jar. Wills *338; 2 Redf. Wills 484. But by statute *402 “ The heirs in the descending line of any legatee or devisee deceased before the testator, shall take the estate devised or bequeathed in the same manner the legatee or devisee would have taken the same if he had survived.” G. L., c.

193, s. 12.

The legatee, Area Sanborn, died in the lifetime of her husband, the testator, leaving one son, the defendant, Daniel G. Davis, an illegitimate child. He is her heir in the descending line, and by the statute will take the legacies which she would have taken had she survived the testator. The fact of his illegitimacy does not make him any less her heir in the descending line. G. L., c.

203, ss.

4, 5.

The bequests of the furniture, “ except the great arm-chair,” and of one thousand dollars, being absolute and unqualified legacies to Area Sanborn, do not lapse by her predeceasing the testator, but fall to her son and heir in the descending line, Daniel G. Davis. He also takes the legacy of two hundred dollars given to him directly.

The legacy of one hundred dollars to Sarah Burns, who died before the testator leaving no heirs in the descending line, lapses into the residuum, and is taken by the defendant, John S. Colby, the residuary legatee.

Decree accordingly.

All concurred.

How later courts describe this case

No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.

1891: 11899: 11976: 11982: 118912026peak 1891 · 1

Relies on it most ⓘ

  1. ROBIN C. v. Schweiker532 F. Supp. 677 (D.N.H. 1982)
  2. Estate of Cloutier358 A.2d 863 (N.H. 1976)
  3. Hall v. Wiggin29 A. 671 (N.H. 1891)
  4. Loveren v. Donaldson45 A. 718 (N.H. 1899)

Most recent

  1. ROBIN C. v. Schweiker532 F. Supp. 677 (D.N.H. 1982)
  2. Estate of Cloutier358 A.2d 863 (N.H. 1976)
  3. Loveren v. Donaldson45 A. 718 (N.H. 1899)
  4. Hall v. Wiggin29 A. 671 (N.H. 1891)

Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.

Authorities cited 0

No citations to other opinions in this database were found.

Keyboard shortcuts

/Focus the search box
j kNext / previous result
EnterOpen the selected result
xAdd / remove the selected result from the download list
n pNext / previous search term in a case
cCopy the citation of the current case
+ −Larger / smaller reading text
?Show this list