Hamlin v. Blankenberg
Hamlin v. Blankenberg.
Headnotes
Summary
Syllabus and headnotes are prepared by the reporter or publisher, not the court, and are not part of the opinion.
Opinion of the Court
Young, J.
The owner of land may put it to any use which is reasonable, considering his interest and that of the other persons affected by it.
Ladd v. Brick Co., 68 N. H. 185, 186. The test to determine whether a particular use is reasonable is to inquire whether or not it is such a use as the ordinary man would make of his premises.
Horan v. Byrnes, 72 N. H. 93, 97, 100. The foundation on which the rule rests has been recently re-examined (Franklin v. Durgee, 71 N. H. 186) and the rule reaffirmed, so the further consideration of the question at this time can serve no useful purpose.
.Exception overruled.
All concurred.
How later courts describe this case
No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.
Cited by 3 cases
View all citing references →Relies on it most ⓘ
Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.