TaiLexi AI U.S. Case Law

Hamlin v. Blankenberg

Hamlin v. Blankenberg.

Hamlin v. Blankenberg, 60 A. 1010 (N.H. 1905)
Download
Format
Include

Star paging (*137) is kept for pin cites.

Court
Supreme Court of New Hampshire · State Highest Courts
Decided
May 2, 1905
Judges
Young
Citations
60 A. 101073 N.H. 2581905 N.H. LEXIS 32
Headnotes
The owner of land may subject it to any use which is reasonable ; and the test to determine the reasonableness of a given use is to inquire whether it is such as the ordinary man would make of the premises.
Summary
Case, for damages to the plaintiff’s land. Trial by jury and verdict for the defendant. Transferred from the September term, 1904, of the superior court by Chamberlin, J. The plaintiff’s evidence tended to prove that rain falling on the defendant’s premises is collected by the roof of his block, flows therefrom over and upon the plaintiff’s land, and undermines the foundation of the latter’s building. The plaintiff excepted to the court’s refusal to instruct the jury, in substance, that ordinary care was not the measure of the defendant’s duty in relation to the maintenance of his premises.

Syllabus and headnotes are prepared by the reporter or publisher, not the court, and are not part of the opinion.

Opinion of the Court — Young

Young, J.

The owner of land may put it to any use which is reasonable, considering his interest and that of the other persons affected by it.

Ladd v. Brick Co., 68 N. H. 185, 186. The test to determine whether a particular use is reasonable is to inquire whether or not it is such a use as the ordinary man would make of his premises.

Horan v. Byrnes, 72 N. H. 93, 97, 100. The foundation on which the rule rests has been recently re-examined (Franklin v. Durgee, 71 N. H. 186) and the rule reaffirmed, so the further consideration of the question at this time can serve no useful purpose.

.Exception overruled.

All concurred.

How later courts describe this case

No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.

1907: 11918: 11974: 119072026peak 1907 · 1

Relies on it most ⓘ

  1. Micucci v. White Mountain Trust Co.321 A.2d 573 (N.H. 1974)
  2. Page v. Brooks104 A. 786 (N.H. 1918)
  3. Moore v. Berlin Mills Co.67 A. 578 (N.H. 1907)

Most recent

  1. Micucci v. White Mountain Trust Co.321 A.2d 573 (N.H. 1974)
  2. Page v. Brooks104 A. 786 (N.H. 1918)
  3. Moore v. Berlin Mills Co.67 A. 578 (N.H. 1907)

Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.

Authorities cited 3

DepthCaseCited by
Horan v. Byrnes, 62 L.R.A. 602 (N.H. 1903) 14
Franklin v. Durgee, 58 L.R.A. 112 (N.H. 1901) 12
Ladd v. Granite State Brick Co., 37 A. 1041 (N.H. 1894) 11

Keyboard shortcuts

/Focus the search box
j kNext / previous result
EnterOpen the selected result
xAdd / remove the selected result from the download list
n pNext / previous search term in a case
cCopy the citation of the current case
+ −Larger / smaller reading text
?Show this list