TaiLexi AI U.S. Case Law

Hart v. Hart

Hart v. Hart.

Hart v. Hart, 39 A. 430 (N.H. 1896)
Download
Format
Include

Star paging (*137) is kept for pin cites.

Court
Supreme Court of New Hampshire · State Highest Courts
Decided
June 5, 1896
Judges
Blodgett, Parsons
Citations
39 A. 43068 N.H. 478
Cited by 2
Headnotes
To constitute extreme cruelty as a cause of divorce there must be, as matter of law, direct bodily injury, either actual or threatened and reasonably to be apprehended.
Summary
Libel eor Divorce, on the ground of extreme cruelty. Facts found by the court. The libel alleged personal violence; but, so far as this charge was sustained by the libelant’s evidence, it appeared to have been condoned. The libel alleged, and the libelant’s evidence tended to prove, that the libelee had so behaved as to wholly destroy the libelant’s marital peace and happiness; that on divers occasions she had addressed him In language both offensive and vexatious, and the use of such language toward him had been her customary and. habitual practice ; that at different times she had accused him of marital infidelity and of having contracted and imparted to her a certain venereal disease, which accusations she knew were false and without foundation; that she had told him she hated him, that she wished he was dead, that she would poison him, that she would take his life. There was no allegation or evidence that the conduct complained of injured the libelant’s health or endangered his reason, or that he had any fear of injury from the libelee. At the close of the libelant’s evidence, the court, on motion of the libelee, dismissed the libel on the ground that the facts proved did not, as matter of law, constitute extreme cruelty, and the libelant excepted.

Syllabus and headnotes are prepared by the reporter or publisher, not the court, and are not part of the opinion.

Opinion of the Court

To constitute extreme cruelty as a cause of divorce, there must be, as matter of law, direct bodily injury, either actual or threatened and reasonably to be apprehended. Robinson v. Robinson, 66 N.H. 600 , 607 , 608 .

In the present case these essentials are wholly lacking. The only act of personal violence alleged is found to have been condoned, and there is no reasonable apprehension of its repetition, or of any other bodily harm. In a word, giving the most favorable construction for the plaintiff, such of the acts and conduct complained of as are open to consideration fall far short of establishing legal cruelty within the statutory meaning as construed in this jurisdiction. Robinson v. Robinson, supra; Jenness v. Jenness, 60 N.H. 211 .

Exception overruled.

PARSONS, J., did not sit: the others concurred. *Page 480

Opinion of the Court — Blodgett

Blodgett, J.

Opinion of the Court

To constitute extreme cruelty as a cause of divorce, there must be, as matter of law, direct bodily injury, cither actual or threatened and reasonably to be apprehended. Robinson v. Robinson, 66 N. H. 600, 607, 608.

In the present case these essentials are wholly lacking. The only act of personal violence alleged is found to have been condoned, and there is no reasonable apprehension of its repetition, or of any other bodily harm. In a word, giving the most favorable construction for the plaintiff, such of the acts and conduct complained of as are open to consideration fall far short of establishing legal cruelty within the statutory meaning as construed in this jurisdiction. Robinson v. Robinson, supra; Jenness v. Jenness, 60 N. H. 211.

Exception overruled.

Parsons, J., did not sit: the others concurred.

How later courts describe this case

No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.

Cited by 2 cases

View all citing references →
1921: 11942: 119212026peak 1921 · 1

Relies on it most ⓘ

  1. Johnson v. Johnson112 A. 399 (N.H. 1921)
  2. Sirois v. Sirois23 A.2d 876 (N.H. 1942)

Most recent

  1. Sirois v. Sirois23 A.2d 876 (N.H. 1942)
  2. Johnson v. Johnson112 A. 399 (N.H. 1921)

Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.

Authorities cited 2

DepthCaseCited by
Robinson v. Robinson, 23 A. 362 (N.H. 1891) 12
Jenness v. Jenness, 60 N.H. 211 (1880) 1

Keyboard shortcuts

/Focus the search box
j kNext / previous result
EnterOpen the selected result
xAdd / remove the selected result from the download list
n pNext / previous search term in a case
cCopy the citation of the current case
+ −Larger / smaller reading text
?Show this list