Little v. Upham
Little v. Upham.
Headnotes
Summary
Syllabus and headnotes are prepared by the reporter or publisher, not the court, and are not part of the opinion.
Opinion of the Court
Clark, J.
The objection that a verdict is against the evidence presents no question of law. It is a question of fact to be determined at the trial term.
Fuller v. Bailey, 58 N. H. 71;
Lefavor v. Smith, 58 N. H. 125;
Kelley v. Woodward, 58 N. H. 153;
Hovey v. Brown, 59 N. H. 114.
Exceptions overruled.
Smith, J., did not sit: the others concurred.
How later courts describe this case
No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.
Cited by 5 cases
View all citing references →Relies on it most ⓘ
Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.