Abbott v. Abbott
Ellen S. Abbott v. Isabel F. Abbott.
Summary
Syllabus and headnotes are prepared by the reporter or publisher, not the court, and are not part of the opinion.
Opinion of the Court
Per Curiam.
It was conceded at the argument that there was no legal objection to a physical partition of the premises. Whether the premises can be so divided is a question of fact for the trial court. Laws 1913, c. 21, s. 3. As there appears to be little, if any, doubt *602 that in fact such division can be made without great prejudice or inconvenience, ordinary convenience in procedure requires the determination of that question before discussion of the proposition whether upon the facts stated a sale of the whole can be ordered.
Case discharged.
How later courts describe this case
No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.
Cited by 1 case
View all citing references →Relies on it most ⓘ
Most recent
Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.