Norris v. Ward
Norris v. Ward.
Headnotes
Summary
Syllabus and headnotes are prepared by the reporter or publisher, not the court, and are not part of the opinion.
Opinion of the Court
Smith, J.
It does not appear that the defendant, when he promised to pay the note after its dishonor, knew that no demand had been made upon the maker at the maturity of the note. In order to render his promise effectual, he must have known that no demand had been made.
Ladd v. Kenney, 2 N. H. 340;
Otis v. Hussey, 3 N. H. 346;
Whitney v. Abbott, 5 N. H. 379;
Farrington v. Brown, 7 N. H. 271;
Woodman v. Eastman, 10 N. H. 366;
Bank v. Brown, 12 N. H. 325;
Caldwell v. Porter, 17 N. H. 27;
Rogers v. Hackett, 21 N. H. 100;
Edwards v. Tandy, 36 N. H. 544;
Hopkins v. Liswell, 12 Mass. 52 ; 3 Kent Com. 113.
Judgment on the report for the defendant.
Foster, J., did not sit: the others concurred.
How later courts describe this case
No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.
Cited by 1 case
View all citing references →Relies on it most ⓘ
Most recent
Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.