Davis v. Herbert
Harland M. Davis v. William S. B. Herbert, Admr., & A.
Headnotes
Summary
Syllabus and headnotes are prepared by the reporter or publisher, not the court, and are not part of the opinion.
Opinion of the Court
*180 Peaslee, J.
The question presented is not an open one in this state. The only charges against the damages recovered for wrongfully causing death are the expenses of recovery. The balance “shall belong and be distributed” to certain beneficiaries. P. S., c.
191, s.
13. The damages are not assets for the satisfaction of creditors’ claims against the estate, and the general assets cannot be used to prosecute a suit of this character to the detriment of ■creditors.
Cogswell v. Railroad, 68 N. H. 192, 194.
It is urged that.because the expenses to the estate caused by the injury may be recovered as an element of damage in these suits '(P. S., c. 191, s. 12), therefore the legislature must have intended such .recovery to be for the benefit of the creditors to that extent. The language of section 13 is too explicit to admit of such interpretation. .And it takes nothing from the estate or its creditors which theretofore belonged to it or them. The statute creates a new cause of •action, unknown to the common law, and provides how the damages recovered shall be distributed.
Whether an unpaid undertaker’s bill could be deemed an expense '“occasioned to his estate by the injury, ” when he left no estate out ■of which the bill could besatisfied, is a question which is not presented iby the facts in this case and upon which no opinion is expressed.
Exception sustained.
All concurred.
How later courts describe this case
No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.
Cited by 2 cases
View all citing references →Relies on it most ⓘ
Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.