Lamarre v. Lamarre
Eugenie Lamarre v. George Lamarre
Opinion of the Court
The validity of the trial court's order depends upon the evidence before it. That evidence has not been transferred. No findings appearing which make the order improper, all special findings necessary to justify it were presumably made. There is no presumption that special findings reported include all the findings made. It must affirmatively appear that they do before the question whether they are sufficient to sustain the general verdict or order can be considered. Spaulding v. Mayo, 81 N.H. 85 . It follows that so far as the record here shows, the court's duty in determining what justice required was properly performed. Petition of Burnham a., 74 N.H. 492 ; Rand v. Anderson, 74 N.H. 601 ; Strafford County v. Dover, 74 N.H. 601 ; Currier v. Silkey, 79 N.H. 534 ; Eaton v. Clarke, 80 N.H. 586 ; Spaulding v. Mayo, supra; Gianaris v. Mangurian, 82 N.H. 558 .
Exception overruled. *Page 554
How later courts describe this case
No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.
Cited by 2 cases
View all citing references →Relies on it most ⓘ
Most recent
Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.