TaiLexi AI U.S. Case Law

Kearney v. Hazelton

Richard Kearney & A. Ap’ts v. Oren L. Hazelton & A.

Kearney v. Hazelton, 149 A. 78 (N.H. 1930)
Download
Format
Include

Star paging (*137) is kept for pin cites.

Court
Supreme Court of New Hampshire · State Highest Courts
Decided
February 4, 1930
Judges
Branch
Citations
149 A. 7884 N.H. 2281930 N.H. LEXIS 68

Opinion of the Court — Per Curiam

Per Curiam.

The application of a landowner or his tenants for a building permit in contravention of the terms of the zoning ordinance of the city had been granted by the board, subject to appeal to the superior court. A restraining order was issued and continued pending a decision here of questions presented by the plaintiffs’ exceptions to a decree of the superior court, affirming the decision of the board. When the case came on for argument, it was announced that the landowner and tenants had withdrawn their appearance. The other defendants named in the appeal to the superior court are the members of the board of adjustment. They are not properly made parties.

Boston & Maine Railroad v. State, 77 N. H. 437.

As there is no one defending in the case, the restraining order now in force should be made permanent.

Case discharged.

Branch, J., did not sit.

How later courts describe this case

No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.

Cited by 0 cases

No case in this database cites this case.

Authorities cited 1

DepthCaseCited by
Boston & Me. R.R. v. State, 93 A. 306 (N.H. 1915) 12

Keyboard shortcuts

/Focus the search box
j kNext / previous result
EnterOpen the selected result
xAdd / remove the selected result from the download list
n pNext / previous search term in a case
cCopy the citation of the current case
+ −Larger / smaller reading text
?Show this list