TaiLexi AI U.S. Case Law

Opinion of the Justices

Opinion of the Justices.

Opinion of the Justices, 154 A. 632 (N.H. 1931)
Download
Format
Include

Star paging (*137) is kept for pin cites.

Court
Supreme Court of New Hampshire · State Highest Courts
Decided
March 3, 1931
Judges
Peaslee, Snow, Allen, Marble, Branch
Citations
154 A. 63285 N.H. 5701931 N.H. LEXIS 124

Opinion of the Court

To the House of Representatives:

The undersigned, the justices of the supreme court being in receipt of your resolution requiring their opinions as to the constitutionality of section 10 of House Bill Number 28, relating to the taxation of incomes, make answer as follows:

I. Deductions of business expenditures from gross income, as set forth in section 10, paragraph (a) of the bill, are clearly allowable. One would hardly think of computing income from business, or earned income, on a basis which ignored such charges against it.

II. By paragraph (b) of the same section it is proposed to enact that there shall also be deducted from income received “The ordinary and necessary living expenses of the taxpayer required to keep him and his family in life as an income-producing and tax-paying entity, which in the case of a single man shall be deemed to be one thousand five hundred dollars annually, and in the case of a married man, shall be deemed to be three thousand dollars annually.” We do not think that this differs (except in the amounts stated) from the exemptions proposed in section 5 of the bill concerning which our opinions were required two years ago. The conclusions reached as to that provision, and the reasons therefor, are set out in the opinion filed January 7, 1930, to which you are respectfully referred.

1

In so *572 far as the proposed deductions exceed $1,200 for a single man and .$2,000 for a married man, they go beyond what is permitted under the constitution.' Elwin L. Page, orally, for the bill.

Robert J. Peaslee.

Leslie P. Snow.

John E. Allen.

Thomas L. Marble.

Oliver W. Branch.

March 3, 1931.

1

See Opinion of the Justices, 84 N. H., p.

571.

How later courts describe this case

No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.

1934: 119342026peak 1934 · 1

Relies on it most ⓘ

  1. Colgate v. Harvey175 A. 352 (Vt. 1934)

Most recent

  1. Colgate v. Harvey175 A. 352 (Vt. 1934)

Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.

Authorities cited 0

No citations to other opinions in this database were found.

Keyboard shortcuts

/Focus the search box
j kNext / previous result
EnterOpen the selected result
xAdd / remove the selected result from the download list
n pNext / previous search term in a case
cCopy the citation of the current case
+ −Larger / smaller reading text
?Show this list