Page v. Campton
Page v. Campton.
Headnotes
Summary
Syllabus and headnotes are prepared by the reporter or publisher, not the court, and are not part of the opinion.
Opinion of the Court
Stanley, J.
It was a question of fact whether the plaintiff' was unavoidably prevented by accident, mistake, or misfortune from filing his claim in ten days, or whether his omission was-caused by his own fault.
Sewell v. Webster, 59 N. H. 586 ;
Gitchell v. Andover, 59 N. H. 868, 364;
Bolles v. Dalton, 59 N. H. 479;
French’s Petition, 17 N. H. 472;
Buffum v. Sparhawk, 20 N. H. 81, 83. And that question having been decided against the plaintiff at the trial term, the petition should be denied.
Case discharged.
Smith, J., did not sit: the others concurred.
How later courts describe this case
No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.
Cited by 2 cases
View all citing references →Relies on it most ⓘ
Most recent
Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.