TaiLexi AI U.S. Case Law

McQuinn's Petition

McQuinn's Petition.

McQuinn's Petition, 18 A. 92 (N.H. 1888)
Download
Format
Include

Star paging (*137) is kept for pin cites.

Court
Supreme Court of New Hampshire · State Highest Courts
Decided
December 5, 1888
Judges
Carpenter, Smith
Citations
18 A. 9265 N.H. 84
Headnotes
A person discharged from the asylum for the insane cannot be remanded to prison if the term of his imprisonment has expired.
Summary
Petition to be discharged from the asylum for the insane. Facts found by a justice of this court, to whom the petition was presented, and by whom it was adjourned into the law term, August 29, 1888. At the March term, 1888, the petitioner was convicted of an assault upon an officer, sentenced to the house of correction for three months, and committed. May 18, 1888, upon the petition of the jailer, representing that McQuinn was insane, he was committed to the asylum. The cause of his commitment to the asylum has ceased.

Syllabus and headnotes are prepared by the reporter or publisher, not the court, and are not part of the opinion.

Opinion of the Court — Carpenter

Carpenter, J.

“Any person committed to the asylum may be discharged by any three of the trustees, or by a justice of the supreme court, whenever the cause of commitment ceases, or a further residence at the asylum, in their opinion, is not necessary ; but any person so discharged, who was under sentence of imprisonment at the time of his commitment, the period of which shall not have expired, shall be remanded to prison.” G. L., c.

10, s. 22. If the proper construction of this language is open to a possible doubt, a reference to previous statutes for which the section was substituted in the revision of 1867 makes it certain. Rev. St., c.

9, s.

17; Laws of 1845, c.

246; Com. Report of 1867, c.

10, ss.

18, 20, 21; Gen. St., c.

10, s. 18.

A person discharged from the asylum cannot be remanded to prison, if at the time of the discharge the term for which he was sentenced to imprisonment has expired.

Petitioner discharged.

Smith, J., did not sit: the others concurred.

How later courts describe this case

No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.

1929: 119292026peak 1929 · 1

Relies on it most ⓘ

  1. State ex rel. Siehl v. Jorgenson224 N.W. 158 (Minn. 1929)

Most recent

  1. State ex rel. Siehl v. Jorgenson224 N.W. 158 (Minn. 1929)

Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.

Authorities cited 0

No citations to other opinions in this database were found.

Keyboard shortcuts

/Focus the search box
j kNext / previous result
EnterOpen the selected result
xAdd / remove the selected result from the download list
n pNext / previous search term in a case
cCopy the citation of the current case
+ −Larger / smaller reading text
?Show this list