Webster v. Hubley
Mary E. Webster v. Bessie J. Hubley.
Opinion of the Court
*432 Per Curiam.
The validity of the covenant not to sue may be litigated in the action at law.
Schofield v. Company, 90 N. H. 31;
Dion v. Mills, ante, 414. The construction of the declaratory judgment statute (R. L., c. 370, s.
20) barring its service when other remedy is available and adequate (Gitsis v. Thornton, 91 N. H. 192, and cases cited) therefore required the dismissal of the petition. The reasons assigned for a reversal of the construction or for an exception to it in the case are not sufficiently impressive to invite discussion.
Exception overruled.
How later courts describe this case
No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.
Cited by 1 case
View all citing references →Relies on it most ⓘ
Most recent
Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.