TaiLexi AI U.S. Case Law

Vanagas v. Vanagas

Domicella M. Vanagas, Complainant-Respondent, v. Stanley Vanagas, Defendant-Appellant

Vanagas v. Vanagas, 63 A.2d 531 (N.J. 1949)
Download
Format
Include

Star paging (*137) is kept for pin cites.

Court
Supreme Court of New Jersey · State Highest Courts
Decided
January 17, 1949
Judges
PER CURIAM.
Citations
63 A.2d 5311 N.J. 3351949 N.J. LEXIS 308

Opinion of the Court — Per Curiam

Pee Curiam.

The decree herein is affirmed by an equally divided court.

For affirmance:

Chief Justice Vanderbilt, and Justices Bur-ling and Ackerson—3.

For reversal:

Justices Case, Heher, and Wacheneeld—3.

How later courts describe this case

No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.

2010: 120102026peak 2010 · 1

Relies on it most ⓘ

  1. Henry v. New Jersey Department of Human Services9 A.3d 882 (N.J. 2010)

Most recent

  1. Henry v. New Jersey Department of Human Services9 A.3d 882 (N.J. 2010)

Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.

Authorities cited 0

No citations to other opinions in this database were found.

Keyboard shortcuts

/Focus the search box
j kNext / previous result
EnterOpen the selected result
xAdd / remove the selected result from the download list
n pNext / previous search term in a case
cCopy the citation of the current case
+ −Larger / smaller reading text
?Show this list