Brands v. Cassedy
Margaret A. Brands, Complainant-Respondent, v. Florence E. Cassedy, Clark B. Cassedy, Mary C. Brands and Blanche C. Brands, Defendants-Appellants
Opinion of the Court
Pee Curiam.
We have carefully examined the pleading and proofs in this case, the arguments of counsel and the conclusions of the learned vice-chancellor, and we are of the opinion that his conclusions as to the facts and his application of the law thereto were in all respects proper.
The decree is affirmed.
For affirmance — Ti-ie Chibe-Justice, Parker, Case, Bodine, Donges, Heher, Perskie, Porter, Heteield, Dear, Wells, WolesKeil, Raeeerty, Hague, JJ. 14.
For reversal — None.
How later courts describe this case
No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.
Cited by 3 cases
View all citing references →Relies on it most ⓘ
Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.