Church v. Consolidated Indemnity & Insurance
Solly Church, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Consolidated Indemnity and Insurance Company, a Body Corporate, Defendant-Respondent
Opinion of the Court
Per Curiam.
The judgment appealed from is affirmed, for the reasons expressed in the per curiam opinion filed in the Supreme Court and printed in 12 N. J. Mis. R.
488 , with this reservation: We deem it unnecessary, on this motion to strike out defendant’s answer, to finally determine plaintiff’s relationship to Cooke, the assured. Whether he was an employe of Cooke, within the intendment of the *205 policy, may quite possibly be a question of fact when the proofs are submitted.
Judgment affirmed.
For affirmance — The Chancellob, Lloyd, Case, Donges, Heheb, Pebskie, Yah Buskibk, Kays, Heteield, Deae, Wells, JJ. 11.
For reversal — None.
How later courts describe this case
No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.
Cited by 1 case
View all citing references →Relies on it most ⓘ
Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.